***GUILTY*** Mark Sievers - 1st Degree Murder & Conspiracy

I am curious about this investigator and the issue that Mummert says earlier that he is not working for him but now says he has worked for him in the past. Curiouser and curiouser....
 
MM said the JAC paid the guy this time
Two more for the "stories your mom wouldn't believe":

"But no, mom! I'm not paying the private investigator and videographer!" ( then admits the defense Justice Administrative Commission is paying for them)
Justice Administrative Commission

"We're videotaping because we're looking for a shady character" - while videotaping everyone...

Description was soon changed from shady character to "tall, slim, elderly man" - while still videotaping everyone...

.
 
Last edited:
Could someone explain to me how the jurors could rationalize convicting of a lesser included. In other words, it seems to me, in this case either Mark ordered the hot or he didn’t. It isn’t like he “didn’t mean” or accidentally promise CWW $100,000 to murder Teresa. What scenario could be used for 2nd degree or manslaughter?
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
156
Guests online
3,658
Total visitors
3,814

Forum statistics

Threads
592,523
Messages
17,970,328
Members
228,793
Latest member
aztraea
Back
Top