Can I ask what exactly it is you are arguing? If LE uses the term POI during an investigation and uses the term suspect after they wish to arrest said person, It seems pretty clear, no? If somebody is wondering why no suspects have been named, it makes sense that there have been no arrests, no? So yes, LE does not use the word suspect anymore during investigations, they use POI. Here is the definition of the term suspect as it pertains to this discussion- To think (a person) guilty without proof - Please notice the definition does not match how LE actually uses the term, suspect was used to mean possible connection to a crime before POI became cop talk. So does it not make sense when I say LE does not use the term suspect anymore, when the implication is during an investigation?Go back and read your post in the previous thread. You start by saying that LE uses POI in place of the term suspect- that is a half truth. You also went on to say that nowadays LE does not elevate POI's to suspects, they just arrest them. That again is not true. Nowhere in your previous post did you talk about when LE uses the term suspect, you just said it wasnt used anymore-That is not true. I stand by everything I posted. Your post was totally inaccurate. It goes without saying that most of the time a suspect is named an arrest is made. Why would they bother to name a suspect without evidence, in the first place? In your 1st post you say they dont really use the term suspect, in this post you basically say that they dont use the term suspect untill they have a suspect.
"Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat. " - Sun Tzu