Holdontoyourhat
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,299
- Reaction score
- 12
RIGHT! A new injury on top of an old one.
WRONG! Abrasion is the visual description, epithelial erosion is microscopic description.
Where do you get this stuff?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RIGHT! A new injury on top of an old one.
WRONG! Abrasion is the visual description, epithelial erosion is microscopic description.
Where do you get this stuff?
An abrasion CAN happen in an instant. But not an erosion.
From the experts who examined those microscopic tissue slides. You're not doing yourself any favors.
I suggest rereading the autopsy final diagnosis, where there are MANY injuries listed to JBR's front, back, top, and bottom, yet NONE are listed as prior.
That would be beyond strange if the doctor thought prior injury was significant but never listed a single prior injury, doncha think?
I can't wait to see this!
You might be sorry you said that. In PMPT, the experts (David Jones, John McCann, James Monteleone and Werner Spitz) examined the microscopic slides of tissue taken from JB's vagina and they agreed that she had been the victim of prior injury.
I suggest rereading the autopsy final diagnosis, where there are MANY injuries listed to JBR's front, back, top, and bottom, yet NONE are listed as prior.
That would be beyond strange if the doctor thought prior injury was significant but never listed a single prior injury, doncha think?
Just like the word "erosion" and "abrasion" have two completely different meanings to coroners.
He wouldn't need to use the word "prior injury". He would simply describe what he is seeing. For example, a "hematoma, yellow in color" would indicate prior injury of > 5 days without him having to spell it out as "prior injury".
Abrasion was the visual description of an acute injury at 7 o'clock. Epithelial erosion was the subsequent microscopic description of the same acute injury.
Yeah, too bad for RDI there was no such description.
I suggest reading the autopsy final diagnosis page, which describes nothing like that.
You just answered your own question. :innocent:
And you're making no sense.
The final diagnosis (I assume you mean cause of death)- would not mention it because it wasn't the final diagnosis. The vaginal injuries were not part of the cause of death.
I'll try again. On cursory observation it appeared as if it was an abrasion. On further, microscopic study (which you mention above) it was proven to be an epithelial erosion. Erosions occur over time.
Hi Hotyh.
http://legacy.revoptom.com/handbook/SECT3F.HTM
Isn't there the inherent distinction, erosion being over time? acute being one instance?
ie the distinction being applied to RCE, corneal erosion,
erosion = repetition
"Recurrent corneal erosion (RCE) is characterized by repeated, spontaneous disruption of the corneal epithelium. In most cases, the malady is preceded by mechanical trauma, such as a corneal abrasion caused by a fingernail"
If a panel of doctors wants to get together, before the facts are in as to what happened that night to JBR, without first hand observation, and exclusive of Dr. Meyer decide that JBR was previously abused based on microscopic slides, thats their option.
RDI is way better off quoting these doctors
Given up on the intruder, I suppose? Can't blame you, its a tough road. Not for everybody.