Obviously there is much more that we have not seen. There would be follow up interviews with Tony L., the Annie D. interview is nowhere to be found. We have not seen one word from Bobby the tattoo artist who did the Beautiful Life tattoo. There were bound to have been some follow up interviews with Lee A., and I am sure there are folks that we do not know about that have become involved as the investigation proceeded.
As for the stain in the trunk. George admits to putting his nose right to the stain, and to seeing it as clear as day and he is the one who informs us it was a "basketball size stain". George has told us that the stain was the source of the smell by his own statements. George has told us he knows what a decomposing body smells like, and throws up at the end of the interview where he is attempting to hide it from his son that he is giving this statement. This is very telling. Cindy is all over the place, bouncing off the walls with her lies and curve balls, which to me says she is attemtping to cloud the picture, so she knows the truth and is helping to cover it up. "There is no evidence" is quite a statement to be made by her, under oath. How does SHE know there is not any evidence unless she has helped to do away with it?
One single hair from a cadavers body with the same mitochondrial dna as Casey is no skimpy piece of evidence. If one of Caylee's hairs came from her dead body, then it is safe to assume that all the other hairs that remained are ON that same dead body. And the gasses in the car from the preliminary report that we saw were most damning...so I am sure that the in depth follow up studies that were done and we have NOT seen reinforce this fact 100%-there was a dead body in the trunk and that dead body was Caylee.
If they do not have any other evidence that we have not seen I would be most suprised...especially due to the fact we have not seen the interviews aforementioned. I guarantee you they interviewed these people. SO if their is nothing damaging in their testimony, under oath in their written statements, then where are those statements?
And why did the FBI conclude that the tests they did on the pizza did not yield any maggots if maggots were not somehow involved in their investigation? Why would they even bring up the fact that the pizza did not grow maggots if there were no maggots being tested?