For me, it's the manner of death (suicide) that is in question.
The poll asks about the cause of death, which has been determined by the ME who performed the autopsy to be "hanging" (AR, page 4).
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&...1Mi00NGE4LWEyZDgtMjc3OWUxZTYzYmY5&hl=en&pli=1
I don't understand why the cause of death is reported as "hanging" when the
actual cause of death was from asphyxiation.
Hanging was the apparent mechanism of death (or terminal event) that resulted in death, not the "cause" of death, IMO.
Anyhow, I don't dispute that the cause of death was asphyxiation, or that the mechanism of death (the terminal event) was hanging.
What I dispute (at this point in time) is the manner of death (suicide), based upon the currently available information.
Even if an independent autopsy is performed (hopefully by Dr. Wecht) and even if an independent investigation is conducted, I fear that potential evidence may have already been lost, due to the crime scene (both primary & secondary) having been released.
Not to mention that the crime scene was contaminated prior to being processed (LE boot print on the balcony).
My answer to the OP: No, I will not necessarily be satisfied with a subsequent finding that reaches the same conclusion of suicide as the manner of death. It will take something substantial to change my mind, i.e. compelling evidence.
As always, my posts are MOO.