How do we know the grand jury didn’t vote to indict? Could you provide a supporting link for your statement, please? Maybe they brought back a true bill and the DA decided to shelve their decision, like in the Ramsey case. It seems the DA’s office was afraid to take a “no body” case to trial; afraid they couldn’t find a jury who would understand circumstantial evidence. Justice for Kyron!
The Ramsey case was different in that the DA and the police were at odds, and the DA had to be pushed into empaneling the GJ much later. Whereas in Kyron's case, the DA and MCSO quickly moved to the GJ stage without any sign of disagreement between them. The whole point of the GJ system is to get an indictment, and if the DA is actively seeking one, it's certainly odd and rare that they would turn on a dime and not prosecute as soon as they got one. Another difference with regards to the Ramsey case is that the DA only managed to get two weak counts of indictment - not for murder, or abuse, or kidnapping, but for putting a child in endangerment.
I've seen no indication that the DA was afraid of taking a "no body" case to trial. It has happened plenty of times, and as I've mentioned, three DAs have been in charge during the whole case - none of whom has gone ahead with charges.
If anything, an existing true bill would just show how astonishingly weak the case against Terri is, if the DA and MCSO are so insecure about it.
Perusing the links
here will highlight more than one inaccuracy in Tanner’s statements.
I don't see any.
My apologies for repeating myself, but Tanner will not be Terri’s savior. OMO
Tanner will not need to be. Terri won't be charged.
Minus his grandmother’s statement that Terri left without Kyron, the most glaring inaccuracy is Tanner’s last sighting of Kyron. We have to guess at a time. Factually, it likely occurred while Terri was still at the school.
Terri entered the school with Kyron, went to the classroom, talked to the teacher, took the picture (Gina Z has given times around 8:15 and 8:30 for these). They then toured together and visited Kyron's old teacher in 104. At least two teachers saw them together (Porter and McBeth, presumably). Terri then says they ascended different staircases and that she left after telling Kyron (who was on his way to his classroom) that she was leaving. While we have two people on the record as seeing Kyron along (TP and TK), not a single witness has come forward and said they saw Terri alone at any point. So when would the meeting between TP and Kyron occur? It had to be in the upstairs hallway, since TP said he went downstairs immediately after the meeting.
This leaves Terri with no witness placing Kyron at the school while she was at Fred Meyer, Hillsboro, around 9:00 a.m. Terri was there. She has a receipt and there is CCTV footage of her. But, where was Kyron?
At 9? Either still at school or leaving with his abductor,
as late as 9:30. Definitely not with Terri, who was driving through urban areas and parking in public spots, visiting stores, with no Kyron in sight.
Around 10:00 a.m., Terri was at Fred Meyer, Beaverton. Terri has a receipt and there is CCTV footage of her. She even managed to ensure a witness at this Fred Myer. But, where was Kyron?
At 10 Kyron would be well gone from the school, as TP has witnessed the chaperone telling the teacher Kyron wasn't in their group. Definitely not with Terri, who was driving through urban areas and parking in public spots, visiting stores, with no Kyron in sight.
Around August 9, 2010, the following was
released by the MCSO:
View attachment 491276
Yeah, this one backfired.
That very day they asked the public about a second person seen in "Terri's" truck at the school, and presumably this poster caused a lot of people to "remember" seeing Dede there, since they had to leak to the media that the second person
wasn't Dede a week later.
So at this point, if they believe Dede is still involved, it is later - after the abduction. And they also have to know that Kyron wasn't with Terri during her shopping tour. That leaves them with the mystery person, who they've never publicly identified or in any way connected to Terri.
Nothing has changed except the possibility that more evidence has been discovered. IMO
You're right that nothing has changed. The MCSO started with nothing and that's what they have now.
Landscaper and mystery man only made it as potential "accomplices" in the blogs/discussion groups. Mostly in the blogs/discussion groups led and fed by Terri and her supporters. In my opinion.
Why would Terri and her supporters paint certain people as her accomplices? The whole point is that she and her supporters claim she's innocent.
But as the links I gave above show, mystery man certainly was asked about as an accomplice.