I just watched the 48Hours episode on this, so I hope this is the place to post as I was directed to this thread from the Lauren Astley thread as I really would like to share my thoughts on it.
First of all, Lauren was murdered in such a horrible way so I hope she's at peace. Don't get me wrong, being murdered by strangers is horrible and being murdered by acquaintances is as well, but it's just incomprehensible when people are murdered by people they are close to like their friend or boyfriend. I know he was an ex but nothing gave her an impression that he would kill her, even if he had fallen into a depression of some sort. Stabbing and strangulation too is quite intimate and she had some other non-fatal marks, so it seems to me like he was mad at her for some reason.
I'm quite happy with the verdict in the case here and I think they got it very right.
I'm quite interested in the insanity defence in this case though. I'm not sure if someone could help me here as I don't know if people would read this thread but anyway, I'll give it a go.
The defence were going for the insanity defence, saying that he had committed the murder in some kind of "episode" that he had no control over but anyway, on 48Hours they claimed his mother had taken him to a therapist during the time where he had had a depressive episode before the murder (and I totally believe he had a depressive episode here) and the therapist diagnosed him with Manic Depressive Disorder (if I remember correctly) and offered him antidepressants and psychology sessions, but he refused, which is what I found odd and leads to my question.
Can they make an insanity defence for a defendant who has refused treatment?
I don't know a lot about mental disorders either but I'm pretty sure people with Manic Depressive Disorder aren't homicidal, but we all know the insanity defence isn't relevant here and his existing mental disorders had nothing to do with the cold-blooded murder of poor Lauren.