spamelope
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,931
- Reaction score
- 45
Male or female, I don't think anyone has the right to break or bloody their SO's nose. I understand DV, I have lived through it. If you throw any object at someone, slap them, punch them, pull their hair, it is DV even if you are the female.
In the article released the other day, we learned more about the turbulent relationship that was the Stewart's. We learned that their fights ended up on the street, with both of them screaming at each other. It does not appear that she was meek and submissive to avoid a fight. We learned that the police were frequent visitors to their home. We also learned more about the charges that VS faced. The police are trained to look at both parties. I'm sure in most cases, it's the male that gets charged. If there was so much as a red mark on VS, DS would have been charged as well. He was the one who was bloody. I doubt he punched himself in the face before the police got there, especially since she apparently plead guilty to the charges. Even after the anger management class, she did it again. As the victim, I think DS had to allow the second DV charge be plea bargained down. In his PPO, he begged for the courts to "Help her" and to help him. There is absolutely no proof he ever struck her, but plenty of proof saying she was the aggressor. I don't care if he told her her mother wore combat boots, that doesn't give her the right to hit him. I am not trying to bash the victim here, I'm just puzzled as to how this got twisted around with absolutely no proof that he was the abuser.
Waiting for the scuds.
SO in this case is significant other, not sex offender. I think sex offenders should have their noses bloodied repeatedly.
In the article released the other day, we learned more about the turbulent relationship that was the Stewart's. We learned that their fights ended up on the street, with both of them screaming at each other. It does not appear that she was meek and submissive to avoid a fight. We learned that the police were frequent visitors to their home. We also learned more about the charges that VS faced. The police are trained to look at both parties. I'm sure in most cases, it's the male that gets charged. If there was so much as a red mark on VS, DS would have been charged as well. He was the one who was bloody. I doubt he punched himself in the face before the police got there, especially since she apparently plead guilty to the charges. Even after the anger management class, she did it again. As the victim, I think DS had to allow the second DV charge be plea bargained down. In his PPO, he begged for the courts to "Help her" and to help him. There is absolutely no proof he ever struck her, but plenty of proof saying she was the aggressor. I don't care if he told her her mother wore combat boots, that doesn't give her the right to hit him. I am not trying to bash the victim here, I'm just puzzled as to how this got twisted around with absolutely no proof that he was the abuser.
Waiting for the scuds.
SO in this case is significant other, not sex offender. I think sex offenders should have their noses bloodied repeatedly.