Nancy Grace Mon Sept 8 2008

Chemist Jeff Flowers, who has testified in state and federal court as an expert, said positive tests for vaporized chloroform mean those results could not have come from anything else -- not cleaning products, not human body fluids or a mixture of anything else.
"I think it's as significant or more significant than finding decomposition products," Flowers said.
Flowers said it had to have been pure chloroform, WESH 2's Bob Kealing reported.
"It could not have come from a chemical reaction in the trunk. It's impossible," Flowers said.
Flowers said chloroform can be found in very small amounts in everyday liquid cleaning products. But, he said, chloroform cannot vaporize or get in to the air unless large amounts of it are present.
Source: http://www.wesh.com/news/17397494/detail.html


FINALLY! Someone came out and cut to the bottom line of the chloroform: that there was a lot, that it was not a mixture, not a chemical reaction. I have not heard anyone come out and state it clearly (esp. Kobi on NG: he squirmed and evaded direct questions about what it meant from NG!)
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
2,986
Total visitors
3,091

Forum statistics

Threads
592,630
Messages
17,972,118
Members
228,844
Latest member
butiwantedthatname
Back
Top