She called 911 during the video.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What continues to astound me on here is all of the people who say they know what to do when stopped by LE. I have had three speeding tickets in my life and a few warnings. Never once did I think anything about how I should act with LE. I am not a criminal, have no criminal friends, have no friends who go to jail or prison. It is not part of my life.
Now I know cuz a person can get blown away for a wrong move. Who knew? Not me and I sincerely doubt the average middle calss white American thinks about how to act with LE. It is not part of our world
What do you mean her husband was going to be shot no matter what?
GMAB
Did she? Or was she narrating the video? Do we know that for sure? It sure sounded to me like she was narrating, or streaming a live update to a social media site.
and what's with the story he drove to wait on his kid's bus, but the wife is within hollering/videoing distance of his spot.What I keep coming back to is, what happened BEFORE the wife started video recording?
I'm really, really interested to find out what happened. Because I know police didn't just roll up on this guy and start shooting. They were there to serve a warrant to someone else, when this situation required their immediate full attention. And I want to know why.
Not a misdemeanor. Felony. He fired 10 times at a guy.Are people really pointing to a misdemeanor from 12 years ago as justification for killing this man?
Or the fact that he was in possession of a firearm, which is a right hotly defended by many of the same people who are defending the killing of Mr Keith by saying "he had a gun!"
I'm sure he did not bring the gun (assuming he did indeed have one; rumors fly after these terrible incidents) intending to shoot some police officers while he waited for the school bus.
Bluesneakers said it beautifully. Compassion is a renewable resource. You can feel it for the child who got off the bus to find that instead of riding home with his dad, he was starting a new life without a father; you can feel it for the man who certainly felt confusion and terror in his last moments on earth, instead of the intended car ride with his child; and there will still be plenty left over for the officer who must now contend with having taken a life, as well as those of us who must live in a society where such things have become all too common.
Do you think there's anything she could have done that would have saved his life? What was going on between him and the officers was going on and I don't think she could have changed anything. They weren't listening to her - why would her rushing into the middle of it change anything?
Videos of police shooting and killing black men have transfixed Americans, relaunched debate on police overreach and sparked protests and riots in recent years.
However, two recent videos -- showing Keith Lamont Scott and Philando Castile, both killed by police -- are particularly noteworthy for being captured by women, who despite their fear of the situation unfolding, maintained their composure and documented the incidents for authorities and the public.
With officers continuing to point guns at her husband, she begins to address him directly -- appealing to him with urgent rationale.
"Keith, don't let them break the windows," she says. "Come on out the car."
Rakeyia Scott goes on to say: "Keith, don't let them break the windows; come on out the car. Keith! Don't do it. Keith, get out the car. Keith! Keith! Don't you do it. Don't you do it. Keith! Keith! Keith!"
The video shakes, and for a moment, a man in bright blue pants is seen near the surrounded vehicle. Gunshots are heard as she says again, "Don't you do it."
She then yells: "Did you shoot him? Did you shoot him? He better not be (expletive) dead." Two people kneel over the figure with blue pants, apparently Keith Scott, now lying on the ground.
Although she is angry, she assures police that she will not approach them but will continue to record. She then asks if an ambulance was called.
In both cases, viewers of the videos commented on how unnaturally calm Rakeyia Scott and Diamond Reynolds were in the midst of the deadly situations.
The women, however, are clear about their motivations, saying they wanted to expose police overreach and hold officers accountable.
"We want the public to take a look at this tape and see what was in the video before he was shot, and what was there afterward, and ask how it got there," Eduardo Curry, an attorney for the Scott family, said about Rakeyia Scott's decision to release the video and the debate over whether her husband was carrying a gun or book.
So he should be shot to death?Well, this guy was a real, ticking time bomb, IMO. It was just a matter of time. Situation makes even more sense when you hear his priors.
But when an object is being held inside their pocket or behind the back, how are they supposed to know the difference?I think a police officer who can't tell the difference between a pan of freshly baked brownies and a gun has a huge problem and has chosen the wrong career. Imagine being shot simply for holding those yummy brownies! No excuses. I don't mean brandishing, complying, ignoring.
I mean the officer thought he saw a weapon, felt threatened, and shot an unarmed civilian. How many times this behavior is acceptable varies for some, but imho one is too many.
Well when the civil suit is filed (and we all know it will be) she is going to have a hard time explaining what she was referring to when she got really animated and screamed "don't do it Keith!" "don't do it Keith!" right before the shots.
JMO