NY - Ex-President Donald Trump, charged with 34 criminal counts of falsifying business records, Apr 2023, Trial 25 Mar 2024 #2

Maybe that makes them even worse than he is, he does seem crazy enough to actually believe the garbage he spouts.
No, he knows he is full of it- he knows he lies, but he knows this: if you tell people something long enough they will believe it-- you have to have a certain type of person to believe these lies of course: you don't believe his lies, I don't believe his lies, but that is because we use our brains- sorry to say, but there are a lot of people out there who barely get a long in society- they manage somehow, but they are vulnerable to someone like Trump, who sounds forceful and some of these people are unhappy with where they are in life and want to believe their station in life is because of others- immigrants, blacks--- look at all the people that believed Hitler
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Updated 3/13/24

NY – vs Trump -34 felony criminal counts of falsifying business records in the 1st degree & conspiracy in connection with hush money payments to two women before the 2016 presidential election. New York County #IND-71543-23/001
Judge Juan M. Merchan. Manhattan Attorney General Alvin Bragg. Defense attorneys Todd Blanche & Susan Necheles.

Thursday, 3/14/24 - Decision expected on motions in limine
Monday, 3/25/24 @ 9:30am – Trial set to begin – Trump defense lawyers have said the trial is expected to last upward of three weeks.
Friday, 5/3/24 - Earliest estimated trial completion date (6-week trial)
 
Manhattan prosecutors tell NY judge they do not oppose Donald Trump's motion to delay his upcoming hush money criminal trial due to expected production of evidence from the U.S. Attorney's Office.

From the document:

Nonetheless, and although the People are prepared to proceed to trial on March 25, we do not oppose an adjournment in an abundance of caution and to ensure that defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials. We therefore notify the Court that we do not oppose a brief adjournment not to exceed 30 days, notwithstanding the People's compliance with all of ourobligations under Article 245.

We also request an extension from Friday, March 15 to Monday, March 18 for the People to file our full response to defendant's discovery motion, in order to permit us to fully address intervening developments since the date of defendant's motion.
@Niner
 
Last edited:
From the document:

Nonetheless, and although the People are prepared to proceed to trial on March 25, we do not oppose an adjournment in an abundance of caution and to ensure that defendant has sufficient time to review the new materials. We therefore notify the Court that we do not oppose a brief adjournment not to exceed 30 days, notwithstanding the People's compliance with all of ourobligations under Article 245.

We also request an extension from Friday, March 15 to Monday, March 18 for the People to file our full response to defendant's discovery motion, in order to permit us to fully address intervening developments since the date of defendant's motion.
@Niner

Thank you! :)
 
I just read an article - and lost it - but there will be a hearing on 3/25/24 per the Judge - to see what the next steps are after he continued jury selection until mid-April. Just an FYI! :)
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
3,522
Total visitors
3,695

Forum statistics

Threads
592,588
Messages
17,971,438
Members
228,833
Latest member
ddph
Back
Top