southcitymom
Well-Known Member
I would definitely like to hear more about this babysitter.SewingDeb said:I wonder why the babysitter was not charged? They have investigated for a year before charging the mother.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would definitely like to hear more about this babysitter.SewingDeb said:I wonder why the babysitter was not charged? They have investigated for a year before charging the mother.
I have noticed that the "Crimes in the News" seems to usually contain stories of the most vile behavior that one can conceive of. I must admit, I have to steel my nerves before clicking on this forum. :sick:Yakwoman said:I have a strong stomach - but this story made me want to throw up on my keyboard.
TRULY! In the Bizarre and Offbeat section you might need to brace yourself for the laughter and only steel your nerves for the occasional story like this. I prefer laughing over stupid criminals any day.Dr. Doogie said:I have noticed that the "Crimes in the News" seems to usually contain stories of the most vile behavior that one can conceive of. I must admit, I have to steel my nerves before clicking on this forum. :sick:
oh no I know you weren't . when you posted that it made me think about it some more.southcitymom said:I wasn't trying to single you out! :blowkiss: I have two babies too and it is so sad to read about!
I soooooooooo agree with you--- there are just times in my opinion, that an eye for an eye- is simply the only solution-----------Paladin said:I think she should die under similar circumstances.
southcitymom said:I saw a video of the mother and she appeared devestated at the finding that her child might have been cooked. The child was left in the care of a babysitter the night before she died.
I do not think there is enough public evidence to condemn this mother, call her names or call for her painful death.
kgeaux said:I'm watching this on Nancy Grace right now. Oh, God. I just can't believe this. I'm going to be chanting my mantra for days now. "This baby's pain is over. Her suffering is ended. She will never suffer again."
The article indicates that the mother thought the child seemed fine - "nothing out of the ordinary" - when she got home. The next morning, she found the child unconcious and sought medical attention.j2mirish said:I soooooooooo agree with you--- there are just times in my opinion, that an eye for an eye- is simply the only solution-----------
I am just thinking out loud here- but if it was the babysitter, how is it possible the little baby ---we are talking 3 weeks old--- was alive after this- alive enough that it wasnt until later they called 911? I know I always checked my babies after my own family watched them so i dont want to hear, they thought the infabnt was asleep--:hand:
I just saw one video of the Mom and she seemed not only devastated, but flabbergasted that they think a microwave did this. Her reaction seems honest.fran said:I'm watching this on NG right now too.
As of right now, I'm not thinking it's the mom. She seems to devastated.
I need more information.
JMHO
fran
The situation with the Virginia woman almost sounds like an accident - like she was in a blackout and thought she was nuking a turkey or something. But I don't know the details of that case. So sad...strach304 said:Linking another report that mentions an epileptic that had done this also. It's at the bottom of the story and I didn't see it on the ones I read here.
http://news.aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/mother-accused-of-microwaving-baby-to/n20061128143509990016
Gmommy said:My best guess is that there is no babysitter.
Like I mention in my other post, if there was an alleged babysitter where is this person? Surely they would have had no trouble finding a person the baby's parents woudl be able to identify and hopefully would have a phone number and address for-not that there aren't parents out there who would leave their kids with a sitter they know nothing about
The DA must have a pretty strong case against the mother to have her be the only person charged, my own suspicions much as I do not want to believe it are the parents-one or both. I am not just ready to fully convict this mother based on what little information I know and I am interested in what details surface in court.
It makes me sick to my stomach to think about but clearly this is not the first case involving an appliance and an infant
fran said:They had the mom's attorney on. The story on what happened is a little sketchy.
She has three children by a previous relationship, 4, 7, and 9. This baby was her's and her current bf.
She and bf went out until about 11 for drinks, came home, they had an argument and she went to bed. The bf was there according to mom's attorney, but at first NG said it was reported he was out until 6:30 A.M.
Mom said when she got home the baby was ok. Her attorney didn't say if she checked baby or not, just that baby was ok.
Sounds like the babysitter, bf's sister, went to bed before the couple came home.
In the morning the bf called out to the mom and said something was wrong with the baby. She didn't think much of it until he said it a little more forcefully the second time. That was when the mother saw the baby was dead.
Sounds iffy to me, imho.
JMHO
fran
Thanks for the info Fran. Based on some of these facts, it makes me wonder why the boyfriend wasn't fingered. History of violence and all. Of course, we all know that there are mothers who will harm their children to get back at the child's father.fran said:The grandmother (mother of the mother) said that the bf was violent to the mom............
The bf has been arrested for domestic violence in the past.
Domestic violence situations, the abuser always has to have the last word.
Wonder if they were going to split up and..............
JMHO
fran
Yes, exactly!SewingDeb said:This puts a whole different light on the subject. I would hope that the BF nad the babysitter have been ruled out before the mother was charged, however.
southcitymom said:The article indicates that the mother thought the child seemed fine - "nothing out of the ordinary" - when she got home. The next morning, she found the child unconcious and sought medical attention.
Again, we don't know how long the baby was allegedly in the microwave. Certainly, if a microwave was involved, I can envision a scenario that would harm but not kill a little one immediately.
I don't know exactly what a microwave would do to an infant child (and obviously, many experts don't know either because it took them quite a while to piece together whatever evidence they have) but it doesn't seem such a stretch that the baby might have seemed to be sleeping with no immediate outward signs of shock. It would seem that the microwaves would have damaged internal organs and then death could have taken a while.
I would like to hear the expert opinion as to why they think a microwave was involved.
Fran,fran said:They had the mom's attorney on. The story on what happened is a little sketchy.
She has three children by a previous relationship, 4, 7, and 9. This baby was her's and her current bf.
She and bf went out until about 11 for drinks, came home, they had an argument and she went to bed. The bf was there according to mom's attorney, but at first NG said it was reported he was out until 6:30 A.M.
Mom said when she got home the baby was ok. Her attorney didn't say if she checked baby or not, just that baby was ok.
Sounds like the babysitter, bf's sister, went to bed before the couple came home.
In the morning the bf called out to the mom and said something was wrong with the baby. She didn't think much of it until he said it a little more forcefully the second time. That was when the mother saw the baby was dead.
Sounds iffy to me, imho.
JMHO
fran