gaia227
I have never taken any exercise except sleeping an
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
- Messages
- 3,739
- Reaction score
- 314
Another thought... and it's way out there... but, what if that body wasn't Judy? I've read that dental records were sent down from Boston to NC and that forensics made a positive ID based on that. However, I also read a quote (I read alot of this case last night after drinking 3 Cokes yesterday and not being able to sleep) that someone said that Judy had had extensive dental work and the body they found had also had extensive dental work. I wonder how closely they looked at it? Here what makes me think there is a small chance it's not her:
- the general quote of implying "oh they both had lots of dental work"
- the local LE saying there was animal hair on her clothes that could be from a horse, when my first thought was wild animals (the comment just didn't seem very 'smart' to me - can't think of the right word here - just seems like local LE may not be making alot of connections all around)
- the long underwear, etc, doesn't match time of year
- coronor saying body had been there at least a year, maybe two
The sightings? Well, she doesn't really stand out or anything - could be mistaken identities. For example, MONTHS later, how do you recall that a woman bought a sandwich and spent X amt of dollars, when you see people all day every day? There are just alot of loopholes here. JMHO.
I have been thinking about this too. The selling point for me is that they did find Judy's wedding rings at the murder site. How else would her wedding rings get there if it is her? However, I think it would be useful to extract Judy's remains and perform DNA testing just to confirm it is her.
I am always weary of eyewitness accounts. People see someone who resembles this person and all the sudden the are certain it is them.....
I think the eyewitness account from the x-mas store seems pretty solid though. The woman was able to recall that 'Judy' told her she was from Boston, on vacation with her husband who was at a conference, she was carrying a red backpack just like the one Judy had. I can see being able to identify Judy easily if you worked in a boutique store and had a conversation with her.
Protocols for renting cars may have been much different in '97. Now you HAVE to give them a credit card for collateral basically. She could have just paid cash for the car but what happened to it? The gray sedan just disappeared? Her body is found but no car? I don't know. I am beginning to think the woman in the gray sedan is a case of mistaken identity.
From what I have heard from families who have had cases on Unsolved Mysteries - they have a habit of not getting info exactly right. The producers may have just been totally wrong about it being their honeymoon. Thank you HMG for confirming you saw it too!