CB, if that Southfield witness is correct, there is evidence that RFG walked away. Obviously, if he was alive on 5/27/05 in MI, he didn't commit suicide or was the victim of foul play in April 2005. The question is, what is the likelihood of that witness being correct?
1. Well, the witness himself is credible. He lacks any motivation to be dishonest and his sighting is supported by his daughter.
2. The witness, of all people, is someone by both experience and training, someone who could identify faces. The contact was prolonged; the witness had minutes, not seconds, to identify the person.
3. The police, unlike other purported sightings, including some in MI, were not able to find some other individual who could have been mistaken for RFG. Nobody who sort of looked like RFG came forward and said, **I was there with Aunt Gertrude on the 27th. That was probably me.**
4. If this was RFG, would there be logical reasons for him to be there at that time? The answer is emphatically yes. Disposing of a car, getting a visa to an area of the world where he had previously traveled are both possibilities. Doing that where he could quickly exit American jurisdiction and on a day where, if reported, there would be limited news coverage also fit in nicely.
Now, that said, there are some problems and I give the likelihood 50% that this was RFG. I'll hit some of the potential problems in the next post.