Peru - Stephany Flores, 21, murdered in Lima hotel room, 30 May 2010 #14

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Recurring Coffee Cup Question, an answer at last?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,594744,00.html

snipped:

COLLYNS: According to the timeline, just about 5:20. They left the casino 10 minutes before, it's very close by. At 8:35 is when Joran van der Sloot left the room alone with two empty coffee cups.

VAN SUSTEREN: Leaves with two empties?

COLLYNS: He comes out with two empty coffee cups. The surveillance video, there's a camera located right above the doorway. He was filmed clearly leaving with two empty coffee cups.

VAN SUSTEREN: Where did they come from? Is there video of him leaving and getting coffee?

COLLYNS: He claims he left to buy coffee, but he came back with the same empty coffee cups. Police say this was after the murder happened. The theory originally was he went to buy coffee, according to what he said, and returned to the room to find Stephany using his computer, and that's when the argument and the fight ensued.

And of course, that resulted in her murder. It appears that was a lie.



Not quite an answer yet to the coffee cups because how did he get the coffee cups to the room in the first place. All reports coming out of Peru stated he left to get the coffee and bread around 8:00 AM and returned at 8:20 AM. This info had to be backed with something as it was repeated over and over again and the fact that he was wearing the white shirt.

Collyns really never answered Greta's questions: "where did the coffee come from and is there video?"

Jean C even reported where he bought the coffee, although she had the wrong place and later in the day pointed out where he bought the coffee.
 
"To enhance the sense of your response, I'm adding Unreals original post:
It appears that Anita has been struggling to raise enough money to fly to Peru. This would indicate that the late, "influential" Paulus Van der Sloot somehow ran through what should have been a substantial fortune, and evidently left his family unable to even afford the cost of a plane ticket.

Anita is an art teacher, so she obviously doesn't make a large salary. Just wanted to point all this out, to counter the constant mantra in the media about how "Daddy" pulled strings for Joran in Aruba, somehow getting the top officials to "cover up" his son's guilt, because the family was so "influential," rich and powerful."

Now my comment:
Before, during, and after the Holloway case, the Van Der Sloot family has never been rich. Aruban-Dutch lawyers and, indeed, the judges that Paulus never became aren't as affluent as their American counterparts. With extensive legal fees, court costs, a relatively modest home, and two other sons, they hardly lived an elite life.

You do not have to have money to be powerful and influential.
In our country they tend to go hand and hand, but it is not always a one to one.
 
Not quite an answer yet to the coffee cups because how did he get the coffee cups to the room in the first place. All reports coming out of Peru stated he left to get the coffee and bread around 8:00 AM and returned at 8:20 AM. This info had to be backed with something as it was repeated over and over again and the fact that he was wearing the white shirt.

Collyns really never answered Greta's questions: "where did the coffee come from and is there video?"

I am wondering if the video of JVDS leaving for coffee was from the day before, do we have an accurate witness or video to support either day coffee trip could have been made?
 
The Recurring Coffee Cup Question, an answer at last?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,594744,00.html

snipped:

COLLYNS: According to the timeline, just about 5:20. They left the casino 10 minutes before, it's very close by. At 8:35 is when Joran van der Sloot left the room alone with two empty coffee cups.

VAN SUSTEREN: Leaves with two empties?

COLLYNS: He comes out with two empty coffee cups. The surveillance video, there's a camera located right above the doorway. He was filmed clearly leaving with two empty coffee cups.

VAN SUSTEREN: Where did they come from? Is there video of him leaving and getting coffee?

COLLYNS: He claims he left to buy coffee, but he came back with the same empty coffee cups. Police say this was after the murder happened. The theory originally was he went to buy coffee, according to what he said, and returned to the room to find Stephany using his computer, and that's when the argument and the fight ensued.

And of course, that resulted in her murder. It appears that was a lie.

Thanks, Nums, for posting this. Forgive my skepticism about this. (Although heaven knows that Greta's guests have never been wrong before.) The hotel and casino videos seem to be popping up in confusing sequences and it's possible that Collyns is making an understandable mistake. As for the "empty" coffee cups, it might be that he's been victimized by the video quality: Remember early on, people said that Stephany was not carrying a purse and not wearing earrings.
 
You do not have to have money to be powerful and influential.
In our country they tend to go hand and hand, but it is not always a one to one.

Paulus' "influence" couldn't get him a judge's job, which is what he came to Aruba to get.
 
Not quite an answer yet to the coffee cups because how did he get the coffee cups to the room in the first place. All reports coming out of Peru stated he left to get the coffee and bread around 8:00 AM and returned at 8:20 AM. This info had to be backed with something as it was repeated over and over again and the fact that he was wearing the white shirt.

Collyns really never answered Greta's questions: "where did the coffee come from and is there video?"

Jean C even reported where he bought the coffee, although she had the wrong place and later in the day pointed out where he bought the coffee.

I do not think there is another video. The bold excerpts from the article satisfies me:

VAN SUSTEREN: Not only is it a lie, it is elaborate. It has been his motivation, and he has told us multiple stories. He has these elaborate stories on what happened to Natalee Holloway, and now this elaborate story.

He's caught on video going in with her and leaving alone. So he's pretty much done himself in that way, but he comes up with these elaborate stories.

COLLYNS: It seems he's looking for some kind of alibi. It was clearly a weak alibi as it turned out. As it turned out, he's pretending he's again to buy coffee and locked out of his own hotel room. It is hard to wonder what was going through his mind at the time but clearly from the outset looking for some kind of alibi trying to think of a way out of this situation he has found himself in.
 
So he didn't even go out for coffee? Since he wasn't getting room service - he just used his old cups in the room and screwed up something to make it look like cakes or whatever?

Just trying to figure this out.......
 
I am wondering if the video of JVDS leaving for coffee was from the day before, do we have an accurate witness or video to support either day coffee trip could have been made?

There are a bunch of videos in the media thread where it was talked about. Jean C mentioned it; a Peruvian reporter spoke about it; it was in loads of articles that came out in the beginning when this case first came forward; Nancy, Issues, Mark Furhman etc.

The mysterious video of Joran going for coffee as indicated at 8:00 AM in the white shirt on May 30, 2010 has never come forward.

Even in his confessions, he was asked "why did he go for coffee" something like that and Joran didn't know why he did it.
 
So he didn't even go out for coffee? Since he wasn't getting room service - he just used his old cups in the room and screwed up something to make it look like cakes or whatever?

Just trying to figure this out.......

That is the theory I have based on the videos and information I have seen. I know there have been so many reports and the stories have changed so much. As of right now, I believed JVDS faked the coffee run.

JVDS will be questioned by the judge on Monday, maybe we will learn new info after that.
 
I will not respond directly.

But moderators, please: now he has called me "Joran."

I am new here, and have tried to contribute without insulting anyone.

Can you not take appropriate action here.

Thank you.


With all due respect, can't you guys hash this out in PMs?
 
It appears that Anita has been struggling to raise enough money to fly to Peru. This would indicate that the late, "influential" Paulus Van der Sloot somehow ran through what should have been a substantial fortune, and evidently left his family unable to even afford the cost of a plane ticket.

Anita is an art teacher, so she obviously doesn't make a large salary. Just wanted to point all this out, to counter the constant mantra in the media about how "Daddy" pulled strings for Joran in Aruba, somehow getting the top officials to "cover up" his son's guilt, because the family was so "influential," rich and powerful.


I don't see how one relates to the other. Being influential by virtue of his position doesn't mean anything in regards to their financial status.
 
snip At the time of the Holloway disappearance, he was generally regarded as an intelligent, relatively popular teenager who had been accepted to a fine college. Behind that image, he was a sleazy jerk who liked to pick up women tourists, a not uncommon trait in resort towns with bikini-clad women everywhere. At the time, he didn't have debts (indeed, he seems to have won money as a poker player) and he had no noticeable drug problems or school disciplinary record. That he gambled has different connotations in other cultures than it does here snip

Chanier, I shall disagree that Joran's real problems started with Natalee. I have read much about Joran's lying and anger behavior problems before Natalee. His parents already moved him out of the family house. There are many opinions found, especially in Aruba, about his lying and anger problems, killing his dog, as example. Please don't as me to quote, as I have done so much reading.

Yes, perhaps good in school, and well aware of father's expectations for him and success (how to appear). Charming, superior, a loving boy - I don't think so.

He did not develop into a sociopath upon Natalee's disappearance. And to me, he truly does embrace virtually every trait of a charming, unfeeling, narcissistic sociopath.

Of course, JMO in health care for many years.
 
wasn't going out for coffee part of his "confession"? imo, it was intended to foster his lie that he surprised her "invading his space."


more lies.

lies lies lies lies
 
There are a bunch of videos in the media thread where it was talked about. Jean C mentioned it; a Peruvian reporter spoke about it; it was in loads of articles that came out in the beginning when this case first came forward; Nancy, Issues, Mark Furhman etc.

The mysterious video of Joran going for coffee as indicated at 8:00 AM in the white shirt on May 30, 2010 has never come forward.

Even in his confessions, he was asked "why did he go for coffee" something like that and Joran didn't know why he did it.


I know PattyG. I too trust Jean C's reporting and I heard it and watched all of the videos you so graciously post. I just think that he stayed at that hotel for 2 weeks and had the cups in his room already. I clearly remember the CNN International gentleman reporter stating that he left in the white shirt to get coffee. I will believe it when I see it and will keep hunting for it in the interim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
175
Guests online
3,957
Total visitors
4,132

Forum statistics

Threads
592,533
Messages
17,970,531
Members
228,798
Latest member
Sassyfox
Back
Top