Justice (and/or karma) can sometimes be a really slow moving train, not too much has changed since I've been gone!.... I had an ulcer that perforated in my stomach 8+ weeks ago. My mom would check on this case for me from time to time (she was my trial buddy), and, as usual, I was always hoping to hear she'd been busted. But. Not. Yet.... They must REALLY have that girl on lock down (with a little pamperin' to keep the fisties at bay), cuz there's no way she's walking the straight and narrow on her own accord... It must be a full time job for that "team" of hers to keep the felon from rising up from within and making a premature appearance! :waitasec: ... But, they're hiding the devil, that's who they're hiding - time will never change her. Someday, when CM has no where else to put her, she'll get tossed out like garbage and she WILL show her true colors... What cheered me up was when I checked here (doing catch up) and I saw there's been some activity regarding the trustees and subpoenas! I hope this leads to something, and at the very least, maybe, just maybe, there's been some sleepless nights for the spineless killer and her associates!... That would be a-okay with me.
My fantasy outcome: the trustee finds out that $500k of Dr. Phil's blood money went to FCA through an intermediary. That she hasn't been able to use more than a few dollars if it here and there lest she leave a paper trail. That the Trustee fingers the intermediary. That the Anthonys are brought up on fraud charges for using their murdered granddaughter's charity to support FCA. And, that FCA's bankruptcy is reversed on the grounds she committed fraud by concealing assets, and that she is jailed for at least that offense.
A girl can dream......
That's a really good dream! Too bad we all know the above is the truth, but all we can do is fantasize about it. The truth isn't the truth in this case, it's fantasy... When it comes to fca the truth always gets woven into fantasy and then somehow discarded. It's such a disappointment that Sweet Caylee keeps taking a back seat to her mother's continuous, unrelenting abuse of her and the system. But, I don't feel sorry for the system, they've squandered so many opportunities to stop fca. Caylee's the victim, and I feel horrible for her...
I think everyone's stuck with a lot of anger because we've had to watch her pathologically lie to everyone, but especially infuriating is all the lying under oath, and to the Judges and jurors faces, then watch her walk free and continue the abuse in civil court. One day she says something's a fantasy and the next day it's real - depending on which court she's in and what case she needs to make a story up for. A needs to talk to B, and figure out what she's up to! There's a laundry list of legal and ethical lines they've crossed. How many times can someone lie under oath before someone in the justice system decides they're sick of her mocking them?...And all we can do is sit around and dream about how totally cool it would be if the truth was a part of this whole mess...
All jmo.
Yes, here is the document.
http://media.trb.com/media/acrobat/2010-07/55220170.pdf No expectation of any further payment. This doc asks Florida to take over her legal expenses, which was granted. I have sent this to the Bankruptcy trustees, no idea if they have acted on it or not..
Again, they don't seem to care! Granted, we've seen a couple of subpoenas recently, and time will tell if it's nothing more than just lip service. It's a start, if they're serious about it this time we will see a lot more action on their part stemming from those subpoenas... We saw how little effort the trustee/his attorney put into investigating Jbaez the first time around! What went on during their conversations? Why was he left out of the recent subpoenas? Jbaez is nothing but a bully and a liar, I wouldn't be surprised at all to hear there had/has been some serious intimidation going on behind the scenes. Even if it were just subtle manipulation/bullying over the phone or during their conversations, how hard is it to request an itemized bill?
According to the Florida Bar Assoc (illegal and unreasonable fees), Jbaez can't charge her a fee that another attorney would find unreasonable - that's the standard - and, in criminal court, the fee HAS to be based on her current (and past) circumstances (employment, assets, etc), if it's based on the future, especially related to the outcome of the trial or case, it would be a contigent fee, which are illegal in criminal court. And what attorney would find it reasonable to charge a bum, with no job or job history to speak of, no assets, incarcerated, facing the death penalty, etc, half a million dollars? And she was declared indigent for cryin' out loud... Not to mention, she and her attorney told the court, both in the courtroom and on paper, that no more money will be exchanged!.... IF, IF, IF that bill for $500,000 is correct (it's not) - which apparently the trustee accepted it as legit - the only REASONABLE conclusion is Jbaez based that fee on future income, based on the outcome (acquittal) of the trial, which is an illegal fee. To be honest, I always assumed there was an arrangement/agreement between the two, being such a high publicity case, that IF he got her off she agreed to pay him back (and then some). He was out trying to hire them both a publicist before the dust even settled on the not guilty verdict! Clueless me had no idea that type of fee agreement was illegal. Kind of explains why they're all covering their rearends and lying about why they've all been babying her, protecting her, housing her, etc. They don't love her and think she's this super awesome person, they just can't say they're protecting their investment... Now if they went out and made money related to the case after the acquittal just because, that's fine, just as long as it's not based on her owing them for the criminal trial.... CMason has only said he wants to recoup the $600,000 (I hear it's 1 million now) he lost, he's careful not to say she actually OWES him that! So he pretends like he's raising her just cuz he's such a nice guy and everyone wants to kill her, nothing more... I guess that's why her bill has increased by $400,000?.... Pro bono my arse.
But, either way, whether the $500,000 fee is (a) unreasonable due to her circumstances at the time (and that they signed and told the court no more was owed) or (b) it being based on the outcome of the trial, both appear to be illegal fees. I would love to be a fly on the wall and know how Jbaez was able to explain the fee to the trustee without setting off any red flags or even a simple investigation into his claims? We saw Watkins' work log. Other than a few conversations with Jbaez, there was nothing done to verify this crazy fee .... Idk, I'm not a lawyer or a trustee, but this doesn't make any sense to me... See if anyone can make more sense of it??? I just can't figure out how this bill got by!
http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/A8644F215162F9DE85257164004C0429
All jmo.
BBMin
IIRC Casey did testify in BK court that she posed for pics and signed release of the photos to Baez and that he got paid for them...but she didn't specifically state which pictures but the only ones of her after being released from jail were the, IMO, staged Ohio pics
http://news.yahoo.com/casey-anthony-speaks-bankruptcy-hearing-194653778.html
Anthony added that she "was asked to participate in" photos and licensed those photos to Baez. She didn't say what those photos were of, or where they eventually ended up other than that she "posed" for them. She said she thinks Baez eventually sold, or planned to sell, those photos.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com...04_1_zenaida-gonzalez-casey-anthony-jose-baez
Twice, she said, Anthony relinquished rights to photos of herself to her former lead lawyer. The first time, in 2008, she said Baez sold the photos to ABC for $200,000, money that was used to fund her defense.
The content and purpose of the second set of photos, given to Baez in September 2011, was less clear. Anthony said those "were pictures I was asked to participate in... I was asked to pose for a couple photographs, but that was the extent of my involvement."
She said she believed Baez sold the photos, but didn't know what he got for them.
It seems whatever Jbaez sold those photos for should've been requested by the trustee because it relates directly to her value. I don't understand why it wasn't figured in, regardless of whether she gave Jbaez consent and was just some clueless little bystander who "participated", and asked no questions
. Seems like any past sales, licensing, etc, whether through her, her family, her attorney(s), are simply proof of what future purchases could be... Even if she lies or plays dumb/innocent (like always) and tries to say her family or atty did it, it still goes toward her value and possibility of money she could collect herself. And just because she says (lies) she signed a release and has "NOOO IDEEEAA" what Jbaez sold them for doesn't change the value. So, next time she stages a pic and doesn't release the rights to anyone, the money goes into her pocket. But I guess that's okay with Meininger and Watkins, as long as they get their $25,000! And any money made through licensing (ABC) is more proof of future opportunities, she still owns the rights. Pretty easy to figure out what the value of those pics/videos are... Again, after seeing the logs turned in by Watkins it's quite obvious very little effort or care was put into uncovering her value. I agree with Zsa Zsa, the $25,000 was no coincidence, it appears to me that this number was more about them, and getting what they could to cover themselves, then it was about finding out the true value and what fca could possibly collect after this is all settled. Some effort, any effort really, would've been nice.... More justice denied for Caylee. It's her value anyway, she's the real story.
All jmo.