Sidebar #1 in Kathleen Savio's forum

New Posts

Birds of a feather, and all that...

Yes, birds to Drew, folks, lotsa birds.... IYKWIM....
icon10.gif
 
http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x65615268/Drew-Petersons-lawyers-bash-lead-trial-attorney

CHICAGO — Lawyers working to overturn Drew Peterson's murder conviction accused his former defense attorney Thursday of blowing the case through legal errors and "a smorgasbord of ethical violations."

Brodsky stepped down from the defense team last month. Reached Thursday, he called the filing "a bald-faced lie" and said the entire legal team agreed to the trial strategy.
 
Ya know, I would almost feel sorry for Brodsky...if it wasn't Brodsky that was having this problem. He has reminded me of Drew from the start and I just can't muster up pity for him at all.
 
Every time I see his attorneys complain about Brodsky being a media *advertiser censored*, I just have to laugh as I remember the picture of them all in the news wearing the sunglasses and laughing about this trial. They were ok with the media attention as long as they thought they would win. Now they cry. Too bad.
 
ohiogirl said:
http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x65615268/Drew-Petersons-lawyers-bash-lead-trial-attorney

CHICAGO — Lawyers working to overturn Drew Peterson's murder conviction accused his former defense attorney Thursday of blowing the case through legal errors and "a smorgasbord of ethical violations."

Brodsky stepped down from the defense team last month. Reached Thursday, he called the filing "a bald-faced lie" and said the entire legal team agreed to the trial strategy.
Click to expand...


bbm

Hmmmmm. I guess I'll have to go back & review some articles.... That's not what I remember, but I could be wrong...:what:
 
borndem said:
bbm

Hmmmmm. I guess I'll have to go back & review some articles.... That's not what I remember, but I could be wrong...:what:
Click to expand...

I think the claim that they didn't, occurred after the verdict. IIRC.
 
borndem said:
Thanks, o'girl.

Hmmm 31 pages.... I guess if I'm gonna read this, I need to get a ham sammich, tea & a sleeping bag
Click to expand...

BBM

I'd call one of my ex girlfriends, but that would require waking her up. :floorlaugh:
 
Still enjoying your buttons, S'Dan!!!
 
http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/

Joel Brodsky’s filing to withdraw from Drew Peterson civil suit is mostly about Steve Greenberg. Read it here

It's a doozy!

Attorney Geenberg is acting not out of a desire to act in the best interest of his client, but isacting in such a manner in the post-trial proceedings because Greenberg suffers from a severemental illness known as pathological narcissism (DSM—IV-TR 301.81
 
ohiogirl said:
http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/

Joel Brodsky’s filing to withdraw from Drew Peterson civil suit is mostly about Steve Greenberg. Read it here

It's a doozy!

Attorney Geenberg is acting not out of a desire to act in the best interest of his client, but isacting in such a manner in the post-trial proceedings because Greenberg suffers from a severemental illness known as pathological narcissism (DSM—IV-TR 301.81
Click to expand...

Thanks, o'girl -- Amazing, but not really, I guess. Prizewinners, all.

Hmmm....what is that saying about the pot and the kettle??!! (and all that)

But I do feel, as I have from the beginning of this messy victory, that Greenberg was the pick of the litter. <smh>
 
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...n-peterson-attorneys-20121221,0,7020533.story
Police alerted about email between Peterson attorneys

By Adam Sege Tribune reporter

4:08 a.m. CST, December 22, 2012

In a continuation of the public falling out between two men who have represented Drew Peterson in court, attorney Joel Brodsky alerted police this week to an email from attorney Steve Greenberg that Brodsky claims made a threat against him.
Click to expand...
&#8220;I think the courtroom is the proper place to enter this out,&#8221; Greenberg wrote in the email, a copy of which was provided to the Tribune. &#8220;I hope to see you there and that you will withdraw this filing. Please believe me when I tell you this kind of filing can only hurt you, it will have no effect on me or the case.&#8221;
Click to expand...

Brodsky is losing it imo.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...w-peterson-motion-1219-20121219,0,44679.story

Interestingly for Stacy's case:

Brodsky does not explain in the motion the legal relevance those claims have to his request to withdraw from the civil case, which Greenberg was never part of. But he argues later in the motion that because of what he calls an "unfathomable error" by Greenberg, Brodsky expects to be called before a grand jury investigating Peterson.

Greenberg's alleged error is quoting from a letter Brodsky sent Peterson in November in which Brodsky allegedly threatened to reveal damaging information about Peterson if he were removed from the case.
Click to expand...

Whaa? Can a lawyer do that? Turn against the former client?
 
Donjeta -- Your quote: "Brodsky is losing it imo."

Yes, indeed. Dayam.
 
Let's not ever confuse a defense attorney with integrity. They may be slick and manipulative but attributing civil responsibilities would be a stretch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 52 more.
Total: 3,934 (members: 53, guests: 3,881)

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
3,881
Total visitors
3,934
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
592,490
Messages
17,969,769
Members
228,789
Latest member
Soccergirl500
Back
Top