MrsPC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2011
- Messages
- 1,658
- Reaction score
- 3,412
I don’t feel good about the testimony of the hitman and the pastor. I thought the hitman’s testimony was very weak and vague when it could have much stronger if he really had anything of substance to say. As for the pastor, the whole scenario doesn’t set right with me. What pastor councils with someone but insists on it being in a public place. I’ve talked with many pastors in my lifetime and have never once had one suggest we meet in public let alone him bring a witness along to watch us. Something just isn’t right and it has nothing to do with DP.
the pastor stated it was because it was his practice to meet in public places but he *also* said it was due to the information in the phone call Stacy Peterson made to him prior to the meeting.
http://petersonstory.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/insession-8-23-12.pdf
The day he met Stacy at Starbucks, he had another person there as well, sitting about eight feet away
named Marco Macola (?). “He was there, because I sensed from the phone call that I had received from
Stacy the day before that I needed to have somebody else there to observe, to be able to see what was
going on.” The defense asks for a sidebar