Thank you for listening
Until recently I hadn't come across this so am really interested in what others hear. Especially as this part seems much clearer than the end of the call.
That's exactly what I thought too Peace777, it wouldn't 'make sense' why she would have to tell whomever that the phone at 911 is ringing but what if John wasn't where he said he was and she was panicking to get him to come to her whilst she was making the call.
In all honesty, I don't have a clue but that's all I can constantly hear.
Anyone know where the information on Burke's remark to the GJ came from?
Im not Zoriah, but Ive played around a bit with the recording also. I havent seen Zoriah for a while, so until she gets here to provide her expertise, Ill try to fill in.Hello Luckymanuh,
I'm really sorry but I don't know how to do this. Zoriah might be able to help out as he/she has played around with the end of the tape.
Your help/tech advice would be great if you're reading Zoriah?
I tried slowing it down, but it doesnt really improve the ability to discern what is said. In fact, by slowing it, it seems to create an echo effect that makes it even less understandable. (I guess thats what you get with free, public domain software.)Is there anyway for you to slow that recording just alittle?
Anyone know where the information on Burke's remark to the GJ came from?
:doh: Oops! Sorry about that, wdYf. That was the link to the folder while I was logged in uploading the two audio files. I wouldn't have realized it didn't work if you hadn't said something. This link should work:Could I just please ask if https://www.mediafire.com/#1er21c2ksz25h is the right link as when I click, it just takes me to an upload page?
DFF was being modest. Here is a post showing the documents captured by DFF:Anyone know where the information on Burke's remark to the GJ came from?
What 'remark' do you mean? Are you talking about when Burke told the gj that the voice on the enhanced 911 call sounded like him, but he still denied being present for the 911 call?
If so, that quote comes from a document obtained by Dateline and aired on their JBR special that came out last fall. It seems to be some sort of a summary of the case, but it was never explained exactly what the document they showed on screen was. I'm too lazy to link but if you check out the 911 call threads, screenshots of the document have been posted and you can see it for yourself. Hope that helps!
It really puzzles me that almost no attention has been focused on this mystery document. And why didn't Dateline show more of it!? Clearly they went through some trouble to dig it up because no one has seen it before, yet it's just a blip on the screen.i want to see the whole thing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What 'remark' do you mean? Are you talking about when Burke told the gj that the voice on the enhanced 911 call sounded like him, but he still denied being present for the 911 call?
If so, that quote comes from a document obtained by Dateline and aired on their JBR special that came out last fall. It seems to be some sort of a summary of the case, but it was never explained exactly what the document they showed on screen was. I'm too lazy to link but if you check out the 911 call threads, screenshots of the document have been posted and you can see it for yourself. Hope that helps!
It really puzzles me that almost no attention has been focused on this mystery document. And why didn't Dateline show more of it!? Clearly they went through some trouble to dig it up because no one has seen it before, yet it's just a blip on the screen.i want to see the whole thing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ah, but not all of the words heard are after the 911-operator speaks.I've listened to the phone call about a million times now, and by this point, I can't help but hear the same thing over and over again: something along the lines of "help (gasp), we need (gasp), police!"
Honestly, I don't think there's really anything to discern from it. If there were voices heard before the operator, then it would be extremely relevant, but since we hear this after the operator begins the call, I simply believe that PR was addressing the operator. The fact that we don't know her exact words -- God, Hun, Help -- is somewhat moot. I particularly believe this because, I don't believe in the slightest that JR was right by her on the ground reading the ransom note; I don't believe that at all. I believe he was some distance away (at least one room over), with BR; and that PR ran to both after she "hung up" the call. I particularly believe this because, when the operator asks "does it say who took her," PR makes absolutely zero attempt to relay that question to JR, who is supposedly reading the note right next her; she instead reads it off the note herself. I want to make mention, that another poster pointed this out originally -- I want to say it was Tortoise (or something along those lines). He hasn't been here for a while and I miss his posts.
The Dateline document is fascinating. The only substantial leak from the Grand Jury I have seen. Very thoughtfully layed out. Of all the criticism of Boulder, their citizens on that jury did their duty honorably. I think they solved it. Amazing it was solved in 1999!
I've listened to the phone call about a million times now, and by this point, I can't help but hear the same thing over and over again: something along the lines of "help (gasp), we need (gasp), police!"
Honestly, I don't think there's really anything to discern from it. If there were voices heard before the operator, then it would be extremely relevant, but since we hear this after the operator begins the call, I simply believe that PR was addressing the operator. The fact that we don't know her exact words -- God, Hun, Help -- is somewhat moot. I particularly believe this because, I don't believe in the slightest that JR was right by her on the ground reading the ransom note; I don't believe that at all. I believe he was some distance away (at least one room over), with BR; and that PR ran to both after she "hung up" the call. I particularly believe this because, when the operator asks "does it say who took her," PR makes absolutely zero attempt to relay that question to JR, who is supposedly reading the note right next her; she instead reads it off the note herself. I want to make mention, that another poster pointed this out originally -- I want to say it was Tortoise (or something along those lines). He hasn't been here for a while and I miss his posts.