Texana
Overreaching
This is the British show with interviews and comments from all parties British involved--Lots here to look over.
One thing that jumped out at me, was Jane Tanner deciding to go check on her children because "the starters would be about to arrive." Sensible thinking on her part, no one likes to leave the table and come back to an empty platter of appetizers.
She sees Gerry on the way--Gerry does not see her. She does not check on the McCann children, only her own.
So each person was actually only checking on their own children? Were the extra checks just a sort of "courtesy" check done spontaneously?
If so, then why wasn't that stated from the beginning from the Tapas diners? Why did they make it out to sound as if they had a very organized plan to check altogether on all of the children, when they weren't actually doing that?
Was it fear of a foreign police that made them keep back the truth, and did that fear in the end, actually become a self-fulfilling prophecy?
By decidding from the very beginning that they couldn't get a fair shake from the perceived incompetence of the PJ, did the Tapas diners actually create the very scenario they feared, by withholding key facts, holding back explanations for obvious discrepancies, and refusing to answer questions?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/7106086.stm
One thing that jumped out at me, was Jane Tanner deciding to go check on her children because "the starters would be about to arrive." Sensible thinking on her part, no one likes to leave the table and come back to an empty platter of appetizers.
She sees Gerry on the way--Gerry does not see her. She does not check on the McCann children, only her own.
So each person was actually only checking on their own children? Were the extra checks just a sort of "courtesy" check done spontaneously?
If so, then why wasn't that stated from the beginning from the Tapas diners? Why did they make it out to sound as if they had a very organized plan to check altogether on all of the children, when they weren't actually doing that?
Was it fear of a foreign police that made them keep back the truth, and did that fear in the end, actually become a self-fulfilling prophecy?
By decidding from the very beginning that they couldn't get a fair shake from the perceived incompetence of the PJ, did the Tapas diners actually create the very scenario they feared, by withholding key facts, holding back explanations for obvious discrepancies, and refusing to answer questions?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/panorama/7106086.stm