I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?
I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?
This is ridiculous. It is foreign, male DNA on a legging. What form was the DNA? If it is foreign semen, I would agree else I don't believe it. I guess that Boulder is moving on...
I thought we already knew that the DNA didn't match anyone in the family????? Am I going crazy here? Wouldn't they have already know YEARS ago that the DNA did not match?
How could they do that when there is not match in the police data base?The news says they found DNA to match the DNA in her underwear on her tights. Because she was re-dressed they say that that DNA must belong to whomever did this.
Why??
The news says they found DNA to match the DNA in her underwear on her tights. Because she was re-dressed they say that that DNA must belong to whomever did this.
That DNA could have come from a factory worker in China. This is an awfully bold statement and simply not true. My Opinion Only