freespeech
Inactive
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2011
- Messages
- 933
- Reaction score
- 5
It's bashing from my perspective because of reality. You repeatedly insist Dina was somehow at fault and that's pretty low. Dina requested her child not be left in the care of her ex's lover. Her request was protective, imo and not much more she could do at that point.
Without evidence to give to a court that documents dangerous or reckless behavior, how can divorced parents have control over toys in the ex's house or who their ex entrusts with their child? If what you believe to be possible were remotely possible, I doubt we'd have what seems to now be constant stream of dead children who have been left with people their parents trusted.
JMO
Do you have a link that shows Dina did not know Max had a Razor scooter?
Do you have information that shows Dina discussed how to safely play with it with Max, Jonah or Rebecca?
I am sorry but I can't simply assume that Dina was in the dark as to Max's interests and activities. Wouldn't Max have shared how cool the scooter was with her? Would there have also been some time spent discussing rules, responsibilities and safety precautions? I honestly do not see how questioning this equals bashing.
I am sincerely expressing my curiosity as to what Dina knew and felt about the scooter and the types of conversations she had about it and with whom. I don't see this as wrong but part of the case development and discussion which is why we are here, no?