What does an ambitious defense attorney do when his own investigators return, after weeks of utilizing every source available to them, empty handed?
"Mr. Baez, sir, we have been unable to find any information about the nanny, her identity, her address, her work history, education, etc...., based on the details provided by Ms. Anthony."
Would/could they surmise that Casey had been duped by an agent of an international baby napping ring?
Many Sleuther's have been asking the question of why Mr. Baez would allow his client to be bonded out and placed in the hands of Leonard Padilla.
During Mr. Padilla's interview with Nancy Grace, I believe he made a comment to the effect of, the nanny could have sold Caylee, as a child of Caylee's age and beauty would be very valuable.
In order to have a convincing premise of nefarious involvement, who better to allege this scenario than a world famous bounty hunter. After questioning Casey and utilizing every one of his investigative sources, could/would he be able to testify to the fact that all his leads pointed in the direction of an abduction by some international ring?
Law enforcement agencies around the world know of the existence of these rings, but have had limited success in investigating and prosecuting such activities. Mr. Padilla may then be able to profess his belief that this occurred, but was unable to track the perpetrators due to their secretiveness and perhaps some form of governmental corruption. Thus providing Mr. Baez with an alternative explanation of Caylees disappearance and therefore, reasonable doubt.
This is just my theory on WHY Mr. Baez would place his client with Mr. Padilla.
Yes, I know that there is likely evidence that will disprove this theory of mine.
I'm just saying, he has to have some plausible explanation to influence the jury toward a reasonable doubt.
Please note, It is not my intent to cast any aspersions toward Mr. Padilla, I'm just searching for possible reasons too!!!
Thanks for listening to my idea!