Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LButler said:Just like this Andrea Yates thing, she's a MURDERER x 5. Insanity has nothing to do with it. If you deserve to be locked up, you should be locked up. And, in most cases, throw away the key!!
Umm, are you saying that anyone who suffers from depression should not be allowed to get pregnant? What if the pregnancy was unintentional? What if she wasn't depressed when she got pregnant? What if she was depressed, but it was under control? What if it was the pregnancy itself that triggered depression?bykerladi said:My big problem is why the heck was she pregnant in the first place? If she had depression and was "insane", why did she get pregnant?
MSM said:Umm, are you saying that anyone who suffers from depression should not be allowed to get pregnant? What if the pregnancy was unintentional? What if she wasn't depressed when she got pregnant? What if she was depressed, but it was under control? What if it was the pregnancy itself that triggered depression?
Also...if she WAS depressed and psychotic when she got pregnant, are you saying that she was simultaneously capable of rational thought and did this on purpose? Mentally ill women can be taken advantage of by men. It happens in psychiatric facilities with some regularity.
Don't they sometimes arrest on one charge until the investigation is complete, or the grand jury meets?SieSie said:I wonder why the arrest is "illegally inducing an abortion" instead of "murder" ??
Rest in peace, little one.
I'm saying that if a woman is depressed and suicidal, then she should not engage in consensual unprotected sex. Rape is a whole different issue, and noone has claimed the pregnancy in this case was a result of rape. What my understanding was from the article was that she was depressed and suicidal for at least the past year. Hence, I do not believe she should have gotten pregnant.MSM said:Umm, are you saying that anyone who suffers from depression should not be allowed to get pregnant? What if the pregnancy was unintentional? What if she wasn't depressed when she got pregnant? What if she was depressed, but it was under control? What if it was the pregnancy itself that triggered depression?
Also...if she WAS depressed and psychotic when she got pregnant, are you saying that she was simultaneously capable of rational thought and did this on purpose? Mentally ill women can be taken advantage of by men. It happens in psychiatric facilities with some regularity.
bykerladi said:I'm saying that if a woman is depressed and suicidal, then she should not engage in consensual unprotected sex. Rape is a whole different issue, and noone has claimed the pregnancy in this case was a result of rape. What my understanding was from the article was that she was depressed and suicidal for at least the past year. Hence, I do not believe she should have gotten pregnant.
In this country, the laws are such that you cannot be institutionalized unless you are a danger to yourself or others. The criteria are fairly strict, and that is why there are so many homeless people with psychiatric illnesses out there who cannot take care of themselves. Also, it is up to the individual to take their medications; they cannot be forced to do so unless they are institutionalized.bykerladi said:If she is unable to think rationally then she should've been institutionalized or hospitalized or medicated until she could think rationally. I'm sorry, but I'm never going to agree that mentally ill people should have a carte blanche to procreate when they cannot take care of themselves or their children - that goes for non-mentally ill persons as well. And mental illness is NOT a reason to excuse someone for murder of a child.
Oh this jogged something in my memory. I think a young couple did something similar. The bf helped the expectant gf to kill the baby prior to birth by hitting her belly or something. But IIRC, this same thing happened, where HE was charged and convicted, but nothing could be done to her because she wasn't a 3rd party. I'll have to look for that but it is this same principle.MSM said:I didn't realize at first that the shooting occurred in February. An article from May 9 states that the abortion charge was dismissed because the statute specifically applies to a third party:
Skinners attorney argued at a preliminary hearing that the charge is meant to be used against a third party and that the same offense with similar wording has been tested in courts in both Florida and Georgia and failed. It simply does not govern an expectant mother doing something to herself, Kevin E. Martingayle said.
..................
Skinner was found guilty Monday of filing a false police report, a misdemeanor for which the judge sentenced her to 30 days in jail, all suspended. Prosecutor Marie Walls requested that Skinner repay the cost of the police investigation. A hearing July 10 will decide whether shell have to pay the estimated $750 to $1,500 .
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=104124&ran=195201