Ivy
Inactive
What a remarkable cooincidence that the acute injury and the area of chronic inflammation were in the same place.
imo
imo
Ivy said:What a remarkable cooincidence that the acute injury and the area of chronic inflammation were in the same place.
imo
twizzler333 said:How big do you think that area is? Not impossible or unlikely at all. The chronic inflammation IMO came from her chronic UTIs, which is not uncommon at all in children, especially little girls. I see it everyday.
BlueCrab said:Twizzler,
JonBenet did indeed have chronic (old) injuries to the vagina. From the autopsy report:
"Vaginal Mucosa: All of the sections contain vascular congestion and focal interstitial chronic inflamation. The smallest piece of tissue, from the 7:00 position of the vaginal wall/hymen, contains epithelial erosion with underlying capiillary congestion. A small number of red blood cells is present on the eroded surface, as is birefringent foreign material. Acute inflammatory infiltrate is not seen."
IOW, the chronic inflamation on the lining of the vagina at the 7:00 position was eroded (worn away over a period of time) and there were no white corpuscles at that location (which rush to scene of an injury unless the injury is old).
JMO
sissi said:I believe it would be VERY important if the BPD didn't find any Santa hairs,after all he was in the home on the 23rd,and there was no "clean up" according to LHP after the party. Does this mean, his red fibers and his white hairs were dismissed as evidence BECAUSE of his visit on the 23rd.?
Did they also alibi their felon/mentally disturbed son,who had been to the home to deliver gingerbread houses?
Ivy said:Even if the birefringent material found in JonBenet's vagina was Santa's glitter, it doesn't necessarily implicate McReynolds, since he'd been in the R house prior to JonBenet's murder sprinkling it. Anyway, I thought it was determined (at least pretty much so) that the birefringent material was paint flakes form the broken art brush.
I think the artifact was not 'an artifact' per se, but was the drying of the tip of her tongue as part of natural post-mortem changes.BlueCrab said:I also wonder what the "artifact" was that was found on the tip of JonBenet's tongue.
JMO
tipper said:I think the artifact was not 'an artifact' per se, but was the drying of the tip of her tongue as part of natural post-mortem changes.
Bluecrab,BlueCrab said:Tipper,
An artifact is a man-made object. Board certified forensic pathologist Dr. John Meyer, with decades of experience under his belt, would know the difference between a man-made object and a human tongue.
The artifact on the tip of JonBenet's tongue could be a significant clue. It would at least be interesting to know what the artifact was.
JMO
Definition #2 is what we mean.BlueCrab said:Tipper,
The word "artifact" in my dictionary (Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary) doesn't have the definitions you described.
artifact 1. a: a simple object (such as a tool or ornament) showing human workmanship or modification b: a product of civilization (such as the jet age) c: a product of artistic endeavor 2. a product (as a structure on a prepared microscope slide) of artificial character due to extraneous (as human) agency.
It seems obvious to me that the word "artifact" describes something that involves artificial construction, as opposed to natural construction. Therefore, the artifact on the tip of JonBenet's tongue couldn't have been naturally-drying saliva or skin, etc. That's not an artifact. It had to be of artificial construction to be an artifact.
JMO
tipper said:Definition #2 is what we mean.
"A product of artificial character" meaning the tip of her tongue (if she were alive) would not naturally or normally be dry.
"due to extraneous ... agency." In this case the extraneous agency was the warm, dry air in the basement coupled with her being dead.
Had she been alive she would have continuously kept her tongue moist. As it was - it had begun to dry out - starting at the tip. The skin on the end of her tongue reflected that change and were different from those cells that had not yet dried out.
Added: Would it help clarify what I'm trying to say if I said a blister is an artifact of hiking in shoes that don't fit? The blister is the natural reaction to an outside agency. In this case the shoe rubbing for some period of time.