I attempted to email Jonathan through his blog (that hadn't been updated in 5 years or so) and it bounced back.
And, of course, you're right. There's no way of knowing if the poster is a family member or not. I can understand a family member not wanting to be discussed any longer.
There's so much we don't know that I wish we did. Like, what the extended family believed happened to the children.
They were either kidnapped which, if the extended family believed they were kidnapped, could make them not want to discuss it out of fear of retribution from those responsible.
If they died in the fire and the extended family believed they died in the fire but Mr. and Mrs. Sodder's grief was so great that they couldn't accept this, I can understand the family not wanting to discuss the Sodder's pain, frailty and inability to accept what had happened.
And, if I recall correctly, the Sodders thought it possible that their relatives in Florida could have taken the children. That seems like the type of thing that might cause a familial rift.
I think that knowing what the people who knew the Sodders the best thought happened to the kids would be an important piece of the puzzle.
I'd also like to know the answers to the following:
Why was the cause of the fire changed?
Where did the photos of the children come from if the house burned down?
Why aren't any of them smiling in the pictures?
What happened to the man who was trying to steal the engines?
Why did the lady who made the late night phone call say she'd called?
Why didn't the bus driver stop to investigate, help or contact authorities?
How long did the fire last?
Can the time the fire lasted (and the probable heat and other factors like whether or not there was a basement) explain why no remains were found?
What was the Sodder's relationship like with their community after the fire?
What did the older sons think happened?
One of them said he tried to wake the younger kids (or one of the younger kids) and couldn't. Did he ever recant this? It seems that if he said he saw the children who possibly died/were kidnapped sleeping in bed during the fire that that would immediately clear the whole case up.
If this case happened today, I think that people would blame the parents...either saying they'd killed the children on purpose or that perhaps the children left home because they were being abused or something. I have never heard anything suggesting the parents might have been involved. I wonder if this is because people reacted differently then or if they were investigated and cleared or if the grief that drove them to tirelessly search and create the billboard was too strong to be questioned.
That last one was difficult to type and I certainly think that there is no evidence of the Sodder's being involved...I'm just wondering why that would probably be the first conclusion drawn today and was one that doesn't seem to have ever been considered in regards to this case.
Thanks for the welcome. I'm glad to be here.