Here is the
Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Deposition Questions Greene filed yesterday Dec. 5 if anyone is interesting in reading this, this is what the DT will be arguing in thursday's hearing to Judge Munyon as to why OCA does not have to answer any questions at all (related to her lying appeal), I love reading these legal documents, lol:
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/casey-depo-response-1205.pdf
on p. 12 in the last paragraph, Greene talks about the decision Munyon already made to seal the video portion of OCA's disguised deposition where she repeatedly took the 5th , writing about how people showing that video over and over "undoubtedly would have further tainted the jury pool......."
HOW ABOUT YOU MR. GREENE (yes, I am yelling at him) going to the media a few days ago and blasting ZG and mentioning everything she has ever done in her life, blatantly trying to paint HER in a bad light to taint the jury pool!! How about THAT Mr. Greene?? These Sunshine Laws put the actual documents filed with the Courts out there for us to read (like the one above), we are capable of reading them ourselves, and if this goes to trial we hopefully will see or can read the witness testimony. If ZG's past life is not in some document filed with the Court in this case and would NOT be admissible in Court, Greene should not be tainting the jury pool in OCA's favor against ZG by portraying her in a bad light TO TAINT THE SAME JURY POOL Munyon will not let be tainted AGAINST OCA, because she is just oh so special.
Grrrrrr, anyway, for your reading pleasure if interested.
IMO, MOO, etc.