Your points are well taken. What you say is exactly what I would like to see done. State what you know and have known from the beginning for instance whether or not it can now be supported by MSM. Expand what I've said to include what you remember; I appreciate you reminding me about that early article on Patricia. Thank you. That should be considered MSM facts not rumor. Maybe you would write that up and if you do include the fact that sheriff Sealy stated at the end of the six day search that he hoped Sara had simply left and forgot to tell anyone. He wouldn't say he hopes something that he knows couldn't be true. Also, I forgot to include Gilbert Baez report about the stepmother's firing which is certainly consequential since he took his report further than the other networks.HAN, first of all, a lot has changed since the beginning of this case. If you go back to the start you will know by clicking on most of the news links that the articles are NO longer available, so , yes if you want to point out that we don't know much right now, today, then you are right. But , at one point there was an article about PK speaking with Sara the night before , in fact it was submitted by her to the news station and had her voice describing her call.
<modsnip>
We learned a lot early on from MSM, but, like I said most of those are no longer available.
We simply cant go by what is now (today) available for us to use when there's not much there. My theories are based on what we had for months. A good example is what you said, about kb not having some things on her fb.I still see everything that I saw from the beginning.
My theories about what happened to Sara are still the same and I go by what I know and what was available to all of us early on,and no, most of it can't be supported any longer if that information is NO longer available.
So your attempt with parts 1,2,3,&4 to bring together in one place what we learned through MSM is not accurate. If we could get all the MSM articles back in full then we would have a lot more right now to be able to support our (my) current knowledge.
if you can find a time to do this it would be great; if it doesn't work out with your schedule I will include it myself. I want to know more not less.
As far as my efforts thus far they have been an honest attempt to bring together all salient points of this discussion in one place for further consideration. I knew from the beginning that others would have things to add that I didn't recall. I appreciate that and want the input.