I am 99.9% certain that Pistorius knew it was Reeva in the toilet if that's what you're asking.
The (mercifully) few people I have come across who believe the intruder story think that Pistorius is essentially innocent and so yes, think it should have been CH.
But that's because they have never, ever managed to accept that even if Pistorius thought he was shooting at an intruder he could still be guilty of murder....a point that I and countless others have been making on this thread and elsewhere since the case started.
Even now when 5 of SA's top judges have vindicated and validated every single thing we've said, there's still a refusal to face facts.
So let me say this.....even if Pistorius thought there was an intruder, he murdered them. Intentionally and willingly murdered them. That is why he is now a convicted murderer, because the SCA had to work from the basis that he didn't think Reeva was in the toilet and their response to that is the exact one we've all had for nearly two years....so what?
It is a crime to gun down a human being who is not threatening you. If you have no legal justification for taking another person's life then you are guilty, by definition, of murder.
"i was scared and not thinking straight" is not, not, NOT, a good enough reason for killing someone. It is not. And it staggers me that you continue to think it is.