Identified! UK - David Lytton, South Pennines, 'Neil Dovestone', 65-75, Dec'15

0d18b95eee527dadd241ce4dc231f97d.jpg

ea6bfe990c0c4b8ec1e8417f5401f510.jpg

More from the binn green car park.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
3a10f4c271d6d4d56290f592f40033c6.jpg

9ed68e4d5e773b584bdd3814c3a69c9d.jpg

288524590af7a0695092e1183ce129aa.jpg

Walking down the hill to the resovoir. Looking at the last pic Indian head is just out of shot to the right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm not very computer savvy so have put first 2 pics up. If they are visible they were taken from the binn green car park the water is the resovoir above dovestones at the opposite end to Indian head.

Yes they're visible, thank you!
 
As far as the documentary being "real", only pick up shots were reproduced for the cameras, such as the shot of the Policewomen Kelly and Nichola walking down a corridor to meet John Coleman. Everything else was genuine and as was shot in real time.


Thanks Jeremy again for your comments.

But Wow! I am floored to learn this! I find this amazing. So the documentary team was following the investigators around in real time? Filming these conversations on the phone, in the offices? I am really surprised to hear this. It must have been a huge commitment on everyone's part to make this happen.

To clarify, I did not mean to be critical of the police, and I am not critical. They did an amazing job. I'm just left scratching my head about the unanswered questions, which, it seems to me, as admittedly someone who is completely naive in the way the police and documentary film-makers work, could have, should have and most likely would have been answered in the course of these enquiries.

I guess I'm just wanting more information, and feeling slightly frustrated that it does seem there is more to the story than has been publicly released. But at the same time, I also concede that there is no reason why I, or anyone in the public, ought to feel entitled to know any of this. I suppose it's the internet-era we live in now.

Mostly I'm thinking about David's friend who picked him up from the airport, and who surely knows answers to many of the questions which remain unanswered. I can't really understand why he hasn't revealed what he knows to the police, and why that hasn't become now part of the revealed story. But, again, I can't pretend I understand how these things work, or the sensitivities that must inevitably be involved.

Jeremy, you've mentioned he invited your questions, but isn't responding to his texts. Have you tried just phoning him to discuss?

Again, I really appreciate your willingness to answer questions, and I hope I am not making any inappropriate remarks. At the end of the day, I feel very sad for David's fate, to have died such a lonely death in such a cold and inhospitable place, which just happens to be literally down the road from where I live and am writing these remarks now.
 
5b26176c850916e156fab7dfe21d9cb4.jpg

e4c4aaca67e166f4fb54c16ed05f6134.jpg

8485006462ee6c3d05b7d5829b00286f.jpg

This is the clearing about a third of the way down on the right hand side.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
de9f09ce8a073dc98e6961770f782dd9.jpg

9871ee0a17cff7c8414d0d481a63c190.jpg

eb373f80b7f77f7f178e66a4f2a99e36.jpg

The last one is the sign pointing back to the car park with a mushroom on it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thanks Jeremy again for your comments.

But Wow! I am floored to learn this! I find this amazing. So the documentary team was following the investigators around in real time? Filming these conversations on the phone, in the offices? I am really surprised to hear this. It must have been a huge commitment on everyone's part to make this happen.

To clarify, I did not mean to be critical of the police, and I am not critical. They did an amazing job. I'm just left scratching my head about the unanswered questions, which, it seems to me, as admittedly someone who is completely naive in the way the police and documentary film-makers work, could have, should have and most likely would have been answered in the course of these enquiries.

I guess I'm just wanting more information, and feeling slightly frustrated that it does seem there is more to the story than has been publicly released. But at the same time, I also concede that there is no reason why I, or anyone in the public, ought to feel entitled to know any of this. I suppose it's the internet-era we live in now.

Mostly I'm thinking about David's friend who picked him up from the airport, and who surely knows answers to many of the questions which remain unanswered. I can't really understand why he hasn't revealed what he knows to the police, and why that hasn't become now part of the revealed story. But, again, I can't pretend I understand how these things work, or the sensitivities that must inevitably be involved.

Jeremy, you've mentioned he invited your questions, but isn't responding to his texts. Have you tried just phoning him to discuss?

Again, I really appreciate your willingness to answer questions, and I hope I am not making any inappropriate remarks. At the end of the day, I feel very sad for David's fate, to have died such a lonely death in such a cold and inhospitable place, which just happens to be literally down the road from where I live and am writing these remarks now.

Probably straight voicemail


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The ring of logs is fixed with wire and staples and pegged to the ground so it's not kids.
I will put a few more pics later.
What do we know about his time in leeds? I seem to remember he was studying psychology and sociology but interested in what years.
Did he drive?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Interesting photos, thanks for sharing! I've seen many similar structures to the branches propped up against the tree, I used to think they'd been gathered and left to dry out to use for firewood until one day I saw some kids constructing one and got chatting to one of the adults with them, and they were teaching them den/shelter building. He said they do it every year in the area I was walking.

I'm wondering if the structures on the ground could possibly be pagan or wiccan perhaps? I think they use circles and sometimes construct altars in woodland. Just a thought.
 
The ring of logs is fixed with wire and staples and pegged to the ground so it's not kids.
I will put a few more pics later.
What do we know about his time in leeds? I seem to remember he was studying psychology and sociology but interested in what years.
Did he drive?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Each to their own as to what they think the pics are about but I'm opting for scouts or guides or some type of youth group. I personally don't feel they're anything sinister.

'David Lytton studied Sociology and Psychology at Leeds University between 1966 and 1970 and was expected to do extremely well, ...'

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ma...-lytton-where-death-documentary--12736486.amp

No idea if he drove.

The M62 wasn't built until early 70's but it is easy to catch a train from Leeds through to Greenfield. Today, the train changes at Huddersfield but maybe before the separation from Yorkshire, (again in the early 70's) it was once direct.
 
Just to add, pagan altars are made to worship nature's spirits and the gods and goddesses They are adorned with items from nature, and other items to represent the 4 elements, such as candles, water, earth, and feathers for example. Nothing sinister at all.
 
Greetings to all. It's my first time browsing & posting here at WS, although I'd been trying to follow the case via mainstream media since 2016.

1. He was wearing his glasses to check in at Lahore, but was not wearing glasses in the Picadilly CCTV?

Is it known if David usually wore glasses ? I do know of people who wear glasses only when necessary (eg. when driving, watching a movie in the cinema, etc.), but take them off immediately after the task is completed. Perhaps David needed to see the flight number & other boarding details properly at the airport in Lahore. Won't want to miss a flight or go to the wrong departure gate due to less-than-perfect eyesight.


3. Pakistan keep cctv images of passengers checking in from a year ago, but apparently Heathrow don't?
4. Manchester city centre is plastered with cctv cameras, yet there are no images of him after leaving Picadilly?

Detective Sergeant John Coleman said in one of BBC Radio 4-World at One's podcasts from the 'Body on the Moor' series that "there is no CCTV" at the South Ealing locality, & "no CCTV in working order on that day" inside South Ealing tube station. I don't recall any mention of CCTVs at Heathrow Airport.

Ref: Podcast Episode 2 (08 Jun 2016) @ 6:18 - 6:31 min


7. He goes to live in a climate which he hates in a country which is not exactly hospitable to his faith

Was David a practising Jew, or did he exhibit any prominent cultural habits that suggest he was Jewish ? Neither his "white European" appearance nor his changed last name (Lytton) would exactly cause people to think that he might be Jewish.

On this note, a BBC News report (14 Mar 2017) indicates that the police found that David had "an interest in different religions, including Buddhism and Islam". Presumably, David might have had discussed Islam & Buddhism (rather than Judaism) with his non-Jewish associates.


9. He has a large wad of cash on him, enough for 5 nights at a hotel, train tickets and 130 quid left over, yet no record of withdrawing it from an ATM, or a card, or a bank account in the UK?

Did David still maintain a bank account in the UK, after he left for Pakistan in Oct 2006 ? If not, don't people usually change currency at the moneychanger's before they reach the airport, or alternatively, at the airport itself (either at the source or destination country) ?

Also, for an independent traveller not on a recreational holiday, it makes better sense to request for smaller denominations (if possible), so it's not surprising to me that David was discovered with £130 in £10 notes.


10. The cyclist discovers his body 10 hours at least after death and the arms are crossed over his chest, yet when emergency services attend the scene his arms are by his side?

According to Manchester Evening News' report about the 15 Mar 2017 inquest ...

14:31: "Keen cyclist Stuart Crowther discovered Mr Lytton’s body at around 8.30am on December 12 2015. He called 999 and was asked to stay with the body and check his pockets for identification but found none. He said the body was ‘pale and still’ and the man was lying with his head towards the peak of the hill."

Since David's "arms were across his chest" when first spotted by the cyclist (ref: Podcast Episode 1, 07 Jun 2016 @ 4:05 - 4:09 min), perhaps Crowther searched David's trouser pockets first, followed by his jacket, thereby moving David's arms from the classic "coffin posture" to his sides.

In any case, I find the instructions unusual. Is it standard protocol for UK's emergency services to advise members of the public to search a victim in the absence of a specialist party ? What if evidence were inadvertently contaminated, lost or destroyed ?

As for the crossed arms & straight legs posture, I've often seen the exact same posture in someone who has pressed the snooze button on the alarm clock but wants more time to doze. It is as if the posture is supposed to act as reminder to wake up later.

Since it was already dark, as well as extremely cold (around 2°C), wet & windy (with rain falling almost sideways) when David was up at Saddleworth Moor, did he perhaps choose to lie down & rest against the slope beside the tarmac path he was walking on ? I wouldn't lie down on the path itself, in case I get kicked or run over in the dark. And depending on the direction of the prevailing wind, parking oneself against a slope might offer some protection from the elements.


13. He has a tube ticket in his pocket from an expired journey when the machines in London keep your ticket after you have passed through the turnstiles?

Perhaps David purchased that ticket, but ultimately did not take the tube ?


17. They've spoken to the surgeon who fixed his leg (see interview outside Coroner's Inquest with Det Sgt Coleman), yet what happened to his leg remains a mystery?

In BBC Radio 4's podcast series on this case, DS John Coleman mentioned that based on hospital records retrieved from Pakistan, the broken bone was the result of "a confrontation", while the "extracapsular fracture" (essentially a fracture just below the hip socket) was described as being caused by "quite a significant impact fall".

On the other hand, David's Pakistani neighbour who reportedly took care of David during his post-surgical recovery in Pakistan was quoted as saying that David's broken bone was due to an "accidental fall".

Ref: Podcast Episode 7 (15 Mar 2017) @ 6:15-6:26 min
Ref: Podcast Episode 6 (24 Jun 2016) @ 3:36-3:46 min, 4:14-4:25 min

From the implications of the word "confrontation", it suggests that David might have been pushed by someone or knocked down by a vehicle, & he fell heavily on his hip.

Below are sample diagrams illustrating what an extracapsular fracture looks like.

323.gif

See middle & right. Source: Hip Fracture (Patient.info)


Neck-of-femur-fracture-classification.jpg

Source: Hip Fractures: Extracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures (OxfordMedicalEducation.com)


15. We are presented with a Channel Four documentary [...] Or were camera crews following the police around from the beginning of the case? The documentary includes scenes which are completely irrelevant to the final outcome.

I have not watched the Channel 4 documentary (the video is not accessible to me), but the above description applies exactly to the aforementioned BBC Radio 4-World at One's podcast series (7 podcasts in total, released between Jun 2016 & Mar 2017) as well.

BBC Radio 4's crew apparently trailed the police throughout the investigations. And all the "irrelevant" red herrings (including the guy who thought "Neil Dovestone" was his father, a mistaken DNA match from Slovakia, etc.) were podcasted accordingly, perhaps to make the investigation efforts appear more exhaustive & the story more interesting.

And in the most recent podcast (no. 7), the reporter described that the outcome of the case so far has raised even more questions, & listeners expecting a neat resolution would probably be disappointed.

Incidentally, I read at this forum that the Channel 4 documentary mentioned a second extant (unnamed) girlfriend. None of the aforementioned BBC podcasts ever alluded to that.
 
Greetings to all. It's my first time browsing & posting here at WS, although I'd been trying to follow the case via mainstream media since 2016.



Is it known if David usually wore glasses ? I do know of people who wear glasses only when necessary (eg. when driving, watching a movie in the cinema, etc.), but take them off immediately after the task is completed. Perhaps David needed to see the flight number & other boarding details properly at the airport in Lahore. Won't want to miss a flight or go to the wrong departure gate due to less-than-perfect eyesight.




Detective Sergeant John Coleman said in one of BBC Radio 4-World at One's podcasts from the 'Body on the Moor' series that "there is no CCTV" at the South Ealing locality, & "no CCTV in working order on that day" inside South Ealing tube station. I don't recall any mention of CCTVs at Heathrow Airport.

Ref: Podcast Episode 2 (08 Jun 2016) @ 6:18 - 6:31 min




Was David a practising Jew, or did he exhibit any prominent cultural habits that suggest he was Jewish ? Neither his "white European" appearance nor his changed last name (Lytton) would exactly cause people to think that he might be Jewish.

On this note, a BBC News report (14 Mar 2017) indicates that the police found that David had "an interest in different religions, including Buddhism and Islam". Presumably, David might have had discussed Islam & Buddhism (rather than Judaism) with his non-Jewish associates.




Did David still maintain a bank account in the UK, after he left for Pakistan in Oct 2006 ? If not, don't people usually change currency at the moneychanger's before they reach the airport, or alternatively, at the airport itself (either at the source or destination country) ?

Also, for an independent traveller not on a recreational holiday, it makes better sense to request for smaller denominations (if possible), so it's not surprising to me that David was discovered with £130 in £10 notes.




According to Manchester Evening News' report about the 15 Mar 2017 inquest ...

14:31: "Keen cyclist Stuart Crowther discovered Mr Lytton’s body at around 8.30am on December 12 2015. He called 999 and was asked to stay with the body and check his pockets for identification but found none. He said the body was ‘pale and still’ and the man was lying with his head towards the peak of the hill."

Since David's "arms were across his chest" when first spotted by the cyclist (ref: Podcast Episode 1, 07 Jun 2016 @ 4:05 - 4:09 min), perhaps Crowther searched David's trouser pockets first, followed by his jacket, thereby moving David's arms from the classic "coffin posture" to his sides.

In any case, I find the instructions unusual. Is it standard protocol for UK's emergency services to advise members of the public to search a victim in the absence of a specialist party ? What if evidence were inadvertently contaminated, lost or destroyed ?

As for the crossed arms & straight legs posture, I've often seen the exact same posture in someone who has pressed the snooze button on the alarm clock but wants more time to doze. It is as if the posture is supposed to act as reminder to wake up later.

Since it was already dark, as well as extremely cold (around 2°C), wet & windy (with rain falling almost sideways) when David was up at Saddleworth Moor, did he perhaps choose to lie down & rest against the slope beside the tarmac path he was walking on ? I wouldn't lie down on the path itself, in case I get kicked or run over in the dark. And depending on the direction of the prevailing wind, parking oneself against a slope might offer some protection from the elements.




Perhaps David purchased that ticket, but ultimately did not take the tube ?




In BBC Radio 4's podcast series on this case, DS John Coleman mentioned that based on hospital records retrieved from Pakistan, the broken bone was the result of "a confrontation", while the "extracapsular fracture" (essentially a fracture just below the hip socket) was described as being caused by "quite a significant impact fall".

On the other hand, David's Pakistani neighbour who reportedly took care of David during his post-surgical recovery in Pakistan was quoted as saying that David's broken bone was due to an "accidental fall".

Ref: Podcast Episode 7 (15 Mar 2017) @ 6:15-6:26 min
Ref: Podcast Episode 6 (24 Jun 2016) @ 3:36-3:46 min, 4:14-4:25 min

From the implications of the word "confrontation", it suggests that David might have been pushed by someone or knocked down by a vehicle, & he fell heavily on his hip.

Below are sample diagrams illustrating what an extracapsular fracture looks like.

323.gif

See middle & right. Source: Hip Fracture (Patient.info)


Neck-of-femur-fracture-classification.jpg

Source: Hip Fractures: Extracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures (OxfordMedicalEducation.com)




I have not watched the Channel 4 documentary (the video is not accessible to me), but the above description applies exactly to the aforementioned BBC Radio 4-World at One's podcast series (7 podcasts in total, released between Jun 2016 & Mar 2017) as well.

BBC Radio 4's crew apparently trailed the police throughout the investigations. And all the "irrelevant" red herrings (including the guy who thought "Neil Dovestone" was his father, a mistaken DNA match from Slovakia, etc.) were podcasted accordingly, perhaps to make the investigation efforts appear more exhaustive & the story more interesting.

And in the most recent podcast (no. 7), the reporter described that the outcome of the case so far has raised even more questions, & listeners expecting a neat resolution would probably be disappointed.

Incidentally, I read at this forum that the Channel 4 documentary mentioned a second extant (unnamed) girlfriend. None of the aforementioned BBC podcasts ever alluded to that.


Welcome to Ws BrokenBrick, thanks for the fascinating first post!
:Welcome1:
 
Just to add, pagan altars are made to worship nature's spirits and the gods and goddesses They are adorned with items from nature, and other items to represent the 4 elements, such as candles, water, earth, and feathers for example. Nothing sinister at all.

The owner of the pics initially said they were reminded of a 'burning at the stake' when they came across a tree with logs and sticks around it which to me would be sinister.
I've googled outdoor pagan altars and cannot find any pictures that look like the pictures VH posted. There are no remains of fruits, candles, feathers, leaves etc on the pics here so again, in my opinion, it's just something to do with youth groups.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
65
Guests online
4,030
Total visitors
4,095

Forum statistics

Threads
592,547
Messages
17,970,799
Members
228,806
Latest member
Linnymac68$
Back
Top