Yes we discussed the apparent planning of first and sloppiness of second, IM not totally convinced on anything yet, but I think if it had been him, these are two different situations, the D's no one would suspect, ............his wife, IN PUTNAM, he would have been a suspect if staged as robbery or soething and charged with murder or voluntary if discovered, where as it stands, it involuntary or maybe he walks......and it's in fulton, so Putnam isn't looking so closely, IDK, curious
We just dont know so everything is in question, like i said, the reward fund he put himself in the middle of and then the due dates on the loans........IT was just very coincidental.....adn I dont think he or anyone did the Dermond's alone.......
Hockeyguy let us know when you talk to that friend about alarm systems....still wondering about that
But either way, either of these scenarios involve money, if family, they gained, if Tex or someone else, it was extortion or robbery gone bad, far as we can tell
QUOTE=CherokeeOne;13371492]It seemed to me like the second was a bit more...spur of the moment and he had to lie his way out of things. The first one obviously had preparation.
I guess tapatalk doesn't want me to have a signature
