https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loc...in-Wisconsin-Lake-437906303.html?_osource=AMP This is a stretch, but if he did use chemicals to destroy her and then dumped it in this lake, I'm sure it might kill a couple dogs swimming in it. He may not have dumped it in there himself. Supposedly they are testing the water, but wouldn't they need to know what they were looking for to be able to test for it?
I dont have a sense he used chemicals, too messy and too much like hard work.
I am assuming he wanted a slave to enjoy for quite a while as opposed to an immediate kill..
I wonder whether he left her somewhere only a v few people would be able to access.. abandoned her.. if he did she most certainly could not have survived until now..
How would he be able to discover such a place from what we know of his lifestyle.. not quite the fresh air fiend, was he?
Some connection from the college, perhaps.. urban, not rural and convenient..
What stood out most to me from that building explored was the plastic..
i hope they at least got a warrant and checked whether it had recently been cut ?
But its too skimpy for a warrant, is it not?
Other abandoned or long time for sale buildings close to his own home??
again, if his intention was to gain a slave, he would have needed to have put some thought into maintaining that slave.. keeping her alive, yet restrained, being able to visit frequently, unobserved..
His own apt was beside the laundry room.
I wonder how big those washing machines were, on the offchance he took her there, tho' I dont think he did..
Maps are really exciting.. but I wonder whether there might be a cave within the tunnel, an area that nobody ever visits..?
