I don't think that he never picked them up on Saturdays because he couldn't get them on Fridays. This is my understanding:
Before she completely blocked him from getting his kids on his weekends, she began by causing issues about his girlfriend not being allowed to get them on Friday for him.
So he would pick them up on Saturdays, but even though he was supposed to get them until later on Sunday, she was also cutting that short by insisting they attend Sunday morning church with her parents, even though they went to the same church.
This is how it began, coming up with reasons to cut the visits short. Eventually she began withholding the children from him at all.
According to him he tried to fight it and consulted attorneys, but couldn't afford to hire one because of the amount of money they needed upfront.
While we only have his word at the moment, I don't really have a reason to doubt this part of the scenario, which is one that plays out daily across the country with others. It all fits with how I've seen these things happen before.
While I'm not putting him up for father of the year, I also have no cause to believe he's lying about this.
With regard to him being cleared, I understand we only have his word for it. But again, I just don't see a single thing that would point to his involvement in her death - none whatsoever.
I believe the original poster who pointed out that he has been cleared was perhaps reminding people that he is considered a victim here, not just because he's not been named a POI, but also because there is zero evidence of any guilt on his part for her death.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
From the leaked 2016 documents, in his own writing, he says that Kristy won't let Heather pick the kids up on Fridays and he works. (Why does he need the kids at his home if he isn't there to actually see them?) As a mother, there is no chance in _____ that I would allow the new girlfriend of my ex to come into my home and get my children. I wouldn't know her from a hole in the ground. Even so, the court order MAY have stated HE was to pick the children up, and Kristy enforced this?!
He then says that means he would have to pick them up on Saturdays (like it would be a huge chore), and then the way I understood it, he only gets the kids until Sunday morning, making it not worth his time for only one day and night.
I did NOT see him say that anyone forced him to give up the kids at this time, I read it to be a part of the custody order, otherwise, he would have had no requirements to relinquish the children prior to his visitation being over. Which means the visitation order clearly stated that the children had to be with grandma for church, OR it meant he willingly relinquished that time to grandma despite "attending the same church" as per the leaked CPS doc. Whichever the case, he did not have the children after breakfast on Sunday mornings, whether the courts choice or his own.
NONE of this is reason to not see your children, for over a year and a half. Especially if you have a visitation/court order which it sounds like they had. He could have, and should have showed up every week at his scheduled time and attempted to see the kids. If he had done so and she refused to allow them to go, he then should have called the police. I realize that often times the police will not do things, I also know in other cases the Sheriff will come out (as many areas the Sheriff is the only officer who is allowed to enforce a custody document). At which point, the Sheriff, would have had Kristy hand the children over for the time in which he was allotted, if she didn't the Sheriff (again in many areas, not sure on in NC), could have held her and forcibly removed the children. No Sheriff or officer wants to do this. But had he called LE every single week saying "she won't give me my kids" he likely would have had a case for parental abduction or something similar, so long as their was a visitation/custody order in place.
He MAY have been told to go to court and to stop bothering LE. But, again, as a parent, there is no way i wouldn't have fought with everything I had to get my visitation. I would have took out a loan, set up fundraisers, asked friends, tried any and all types of legal aid, and so on. Where there is a will, there is a way.
Unfortunately, from the documents AW leaked, there are pages missing as when you read their are a few that cut off at the end and don't pick up anywhere else. None of the pages say anything negative about him, only Kristy. They don't paint the full picture of what the court said, nor do they even represent a final judgement, as these were response reports to the courts before a hearing of some sort. In the doc you see him say "agree, agree, agree, disagree -reason" and that means that the court was gathering what our courts in my area refer to as an "Agreed Statement of Facts". It is a document compiled based on accusations, known facts and so on, that all party's have to respond to, and then file with the courts. The courts can then go over the true and false and make a determination. So, basically, what we have seen (or I have seen) are the beginnings or middle of a family court case, not the end, and the end result is the result that mattered.
IMO the fact that AW only released the parts that didn't include him as the bad guy, speaks volumes.
Speaking to whether or not he has been cleared, it simply doesn't seem relevant to me, as he didn't live there and to our knowledge, wasn't at that home that night. However, IMO there is a reason why the MSM reported that the up to date leaked documents contained a picture of Heather scratched out. There is a reason that same child said they hated their dad. AND more importantly, there is a reason why CPS did NOT automatically put the kids into his care instead of someone elses.
He can scream from the highest rooftop about how great of a dad he is, but to see is to believe, and I personally haven't seen anything to convince me he was a father to Mariah or the other children, at all, in the past year or more.
ALL Just my opinion and since I am NOT local there may be mistakes on how things work in that state and county.
MOO