I'm sure it goes back to LE not revealing details of their "timeline." LE allegedly first revealed similar info to brother Jake that he shared with local news, and WS thread lit up with both denials and accusations resulting in the first thread close down I believe!
I completely agree. Everyone I talk to around here thinks that though. I don't live too far away and I80 is one of the most used interstates for sex trafficing.
I am envisioning whoever has her releases her, and puts in a tip to claim the reward money. If that money is rewarded anonymously we won't know who it was. And, Mollie could claim to need her privacy (completely understood) and no one will ever know what happened...is that even remotely a possibility? I am hoping it makes sense...
Of course everyone makes mistakes, my point was we should not be judging or criticizing them when we dont understand all the aspects of their job and especially the decisions they make to conduct an investigation. I don't think it is appropriate to put them down, but I am certainly aware they make mistakes. But I myself am not in a position to assume a mistake has been made. As for the long stories, yes if it has relevance to the case I don't mind reading them at all, maybe I wasn't specific, I meant personal stories that have nothing to do with the case and it's hard when you are trying to catch up. I like to read every post if I can. I don't know what you are referring to when you say the profiler said someone must have seen someone in town or who "she" is, maybe I didn't see that part. I was simply saying I don't think it's necessary to critisize and put down people who are working so hard on this case. They are putting in 16 hours a day, many of them, and this case has been extremely personal for them. I'm sure they will remember it long after we have forgotten it, if it turns out to have a horrible outcome. I hope that was more clear. I never meant to imply that I don't think they can make mistakes, more so that I don't think they deserve to be put down. Same for the witnesses.
Has anyone seen a picture of the brother’s soon to be wife? I would be interested if their aree physical similarities. At this point anything is possible and mistaken identity by either a jealous ex or a hired hand, is just as valid as the next theory.
It’s on everyone’s mind because of the news coverage it has generated recently. But college students aren’t abducted off the street and forced into sex trafficking, it just doesn’t happen with any regularity.
well, they're both females.
That wouldn't be the worst outcome.
Unfortunately LE appears to have no credible leads as to what occurred ....3 weeks and nothing..his is a shame! That Mr Tibbetts is at the county fair attempting to obtain information regarding his "Mollie" clearly indicates LE does not have a 'clue' as to what happened to/with Mollie. The family is being very patient with LE because they do not want to step on the toes of LE or offend LE since LE is their life-line of hope to finding Mollie. But they should use some of the $330k+ reward monies to hire a private investigative firm.....the investigation needs new ideas and new eyes.
I think they look very much alike.
That makes a lot of sense.
I've seen her and they do NOT look alike at all. Not even distant cousins.
And if that is how this all ends up it would be such a wonderful outcome!! Mollie safe and home and unharmed and whatever happened could remain a mystery forever- it would be the best option yet!!!
If she had someone (a male perhaps?) go to the house to beat her up/kidnap her/? before the wedding, things could have gone wrong.
Not very similar
