Reporter Kevin Donovan quote from his article:
"Sources have told the Star that Barry’s will left everything to Honey if he died first; if she predeceased him, it divided the estimated $5-billion estate and control of Apotex between their four children, aged 28 to 43."
Unfortunately, Kevin lost total credibility with the above statement (from sources--not a source, but sources). If Honey died before Barry, she couldn't leave their entire $5 billion estate to their kids, meaning BS would be left with nothing.
Maybe this is a misprint...he meant to say that if Honey survived Barry, her estate would be divided among their children when she died. That is the usual agreement between a married couple who trust each other and want their kids to share equally when both have died.
If this was not a misprint, is Donovan trying to use Honey's (alleged) missing will (where Barry gets nothing) as a motive for Barry to kill her? As ridiculous as this sounds, I think that is what he is implying, after reading his entire article which suggests that the Court and police are complicit in a cover-up. You don't even have to read his article--his head line says it clearly "WHERE IS HONEY'S WILL"?
Any other potentially, legitimate actions pointing to a cover-up were pretty much debased imo.
Where is Honey Sherman’s will? | The Star