afitzy
Former Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 11,285
- Reaction score
- 126,553
The FC proceedings never got to the point of discussing child support in great part IMO due to the lack of financial disclosure from FD and his delay delay delay tactics for 2 yrs. JF paid for everything related to the children and GF paid for 1/2 GAL fees and 1/2 education fees if I recall. When this issue was last raised in the press the insulting and highly ironic/moronic statement from Atty R was to say that FD was not required by the Court to pay child support. Just take a second and think about what would have happened to JF and her 5 children IF SHE DIDN"T HAVE THE MONEY TO FUND THEIR LIVES??????In some states you get arrested if you don't pay child support. I guess CT is pretty lax?
FD was a deadbeat dad and deadbeat husband and contributed precisely ZERO to the welfare and well being of his children and this was allowed by the courts and his atty had the audacity to put this idea back to the press as a reason that no support was forthcoming was because it wasn't required! It wasn't required because of the delay tactics employed by FD to make it impossible for the court to make him pay anything as the last nonsense statement was that his annual income was $50,000/yr. This wouldn't cover much if anything of what was required for 5 children.
Entire situation was a FARCE IMO but was made worse by the moronic (if true) statements of his FC atty. No words to describe this situation and I sincerely hope that when the inevitable case for termination of parental rights happens that this entire sequence of events regarding lack of support will be played out IN FULL as FD abdicated any/all responsibility for his 5 children to JF the day she left 4Jx IMO.
MOO
Last edited: