I wonder if he hid from something or someone he heard, and couldn't get back out of the chimney, or maybe had a rope hooked up in there and fell. But you'd think a 14 year old would yell if he were stuck. Just remembering being 14, although long ago, a vacant nearby house would become a club house. There have to be other kids who knew he used the house. He probably slept there multiple times just to worry the Mom (not dissing him, just speaking reality from a 14 year old mind). From all the activity on the second floor of the house, I wonder if the chimney had an opening there, ie fireplace, and on the ground floor. I don't blame the parents for not noticing the house was empty, it probably had lights at night, and may very well have been heated, given that he may have removed his own coat on those cold days/nights. Looks like the house opens on the other street, not on the street where parents live-It is possible he got inside by going down the chimney. I don't think he was stuck in the chimney (unless someone else was involved) because of his coat being inside. Maybe he had some scrapes or bruises from going down the chimney and that is what LE is investigating. If here was some blood, it could have come from that, or something much worse. This is a terribly tragic story. MOO
We don't have verification that it was actually his coat. Do we?
It is possible he got inside by going down the chimney. I don't think he was stuck in the chimney (unless someone else was involved) because of his coat being inside. Maybe he had some scrapes or bruises from going down the chimney and that is what LE is investigating. If here was some blood, it could have come from that, or something much worse. This is a terribly tragic story. MOO
Don't chimneys have some type of grate to keep stuff out?
We have investment (rental) properties that we have set up as a trust. This means if you were to look up who owns the house at xxxx whatever st, it wouldn't show our name specifically. There would need to be further investigation in order to find out who owned the property - maybe that's a possible scenario here which delayed the owner being contacted? Just a thoughtI would think that they'd have knocked on every door nearby Harley's house and questioned those neighbors. And when nobody answered at the unoccupied house, they'd have went back and tried again. And if nobody answered there again, then they'd follow up on that, too. Like try again until they get somebody or try to contact the owner. Apparently they had no trouble contacting the owner yesterday to get permission to search..
So, the explanation that LE didn't know until yesterday that it was unoccupied is ridiculous if they were doing actual police work trying to find Harley. I mean, what, did they just go "Welp, I guess those people aren't going to talk to us. Moving on!" after nobody answered the door there..?
my opinion only
Do we have verification that's 100 concrete on anything at this moment? The speculation is a little overwhelming right now.
These are not yet known facts.
I agree that is creepy! And while it's probably not related to your guy, I just wanted to point out that who owns what property is publicly available information. Nowadays most counties have it searchable online, but this information is typically available at each county's recorder's office.
I would think LE would have canvassed the neighborhood several times - knocking on doors, etc. If LE didn’t already know the home was vacant, I would think they would have at least looked into why they were never able to make contact with an occupant during numerous attempts to speak with neighbors.The only explanation I can think of is that they simply didn't realize the house wasn't occupied. Given its upkeep, it would be natural to not see it initially as a vacant home.
Neighbors might have known given that it hasn't been lived in in, according to homeowner, 10 years, but I couldn't tell you who half my neighbors are either, so... who knows?
I am waaay behind here. This is crazy??? Do we have a presser coming? TIA
Wonder if there was a caretaker locally that would check on place?Just posting thoughts on the vacant property. 1. Either It was winterized, no heat, no running water. 2. Or it was still heated, water running, warm and if known to be vacant, could make a good hideout or a good place to commit a crime (if someone else is involved).
I can buy into a 14 year old climbing down a chimney (I guess) to gain access to a locked, vacant home, but he had to have made it once to leave his jacket there, so why didn't he just unlock a back door or window instead of using the chimney (presumably) a second, fatal time? Using the chimney would seem like it would be far more likely to be seen...it's just so strange. Hoping the press conference gives some answers.
I know hindsight is 20/20, but I am still just flummoxed that a nearby, long-vacant home wasn't searched more thoroughly. Seems like one of the first things to do would be look in sheds, barns, parked RVs, vacant homes, etc. that are close by and would be known to him. I guess maybe it's just so hard to think of him right there and not found sooner.