Gardener1850
Timeline Guru (Still Remembering Cupcake)
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2016
- Messages
- 42,099
- Reaction score
- 117,921
In light of the news that Lori's sole attorney remaining on the case is Mark Means, I feel a repost of his website and a site where clients have reviewed his past performance is in order:
Means-Law Attorney
https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/83642-id-mark-means-4433178.html
I’m kinda wondering if maybe the same thing that made Alex drop dead also made Tammy drop dead.
That's a very interesting photo of Means and Webb looking at each other during the Initial Hearing. They seem to be challenging each other with intense glares. IIRC Elcox argued the motions alone for Lori's side. Maybe Means and Webb could not agree even then how to present their argument for lowered bail? MOO.
I also wanted to note for @Ohmeohmy we can see Lori's footwear in this photo. I think you were the one keeping track for us?![]()
Retrospectively, I think that CV and TD controlled all the finances with their wayward spouses... all hell can break lose for both of them. Such children.Lori and Alex appear to have zero assets and both got evicted from their rentals so what do they spend their money on? On the rental and vehicle costs? They clearly were in it for the life insurance payouts they thought they would get. MOO
In terms of manila folders vs. leather binders though … I don't know … seems to me that whoever chooses their counsel based on their accessories budget kind of deserves whatever he or she gets …
I have stated before... I don't think that IP has anything to do with 'protecting his children". I am sure his ex-wife will absolutely take care of that... bless her soul.Divorce documents. And yes. You are reading that right.
These statements are confusing. After they were released to the public, IP and MBP showed up together at her court hearing. If IP really thought his new wife was capable of harming his children, why would he support her? MOO
Eric Grossarth
@ericgrossarth
·
9m
CORRECTION: A review of the video taken in court and a closer look at what was said via telephone show Edwina Elcox also plans to leave the case as well.
I genuinely believe LE is just letting enough out at a time to keep the defense spinning their wheels in gravel wearing themselves out and then “Bam!” MOOAnd... when it turns into a Federal Case they will get yet another judge.![]()
Thank you, this is the kind of answer I was looking for!Listening to the judge now, he is saying the motion to remove without cause was timely for a "contested proceeding" but not a "contested motion" and the statute has both listed. It sounds to me he thinks it is faster, easier, and erring on the side of the defense to just grant the motion to remove without cause and get on with the show rather than argue the wording in the statute.
I haven’t seen anything either.I hope he's genuine and not just jumping on the media bandwagon.
What have they copied?
@AZlawyer if you don't mind and if you have the time - could you explain if a change of judge means she gets to ask again for a bail reduction, and in general, is there a limit on how many requests for bail reduction can be made?
Thanks in advance.
THANK YOU!!This is what I thought I understood it to mean, but I don't have any legal knowledge, so I wasn't sure. Appreciate you clear and concise answer.Plain English translation of what the judge said about the motion to disqualify (in the video posted somewhere above):
He tried to figure out if the bond proceeding counted as a “contested proceeding” under Idaho law. (If it WAS a “contested proceeding,” the “without cause” motion was filed too late and some other judge would have to consider the “with cause” motion.) He did a lot of research but couldn’t come up with any crystal clear answer. So he decided to “err on the side of caution” and just grant the motion to disqualify without cause. So there will be a new judge and the “with cause” motion is moot.
ITA. Even last week when they had the hearing, I thought MM seemed bothered by Elcox whenever she would speak. He stared down at the table intensely, IMO. He never looks at her while she is speaking, that I noticed. I feel like after knowing how he handles poor reviews, that he needs to be the know-it-all. He criticizes and deflects (read his replies to the 1 star reviews in link recently posted above). His areas of expertise seem to be the easier-to-win type cases(MOO) and his website reminds me of a billboard I would see driving on a long and straight interstate.Wow. I didn't expect the judge to agree to the motion to disqualify himself without cause. But I suppose this will prevent Lori from appealing later and saying her first judge was biased. Am I the only one who got the impression that Webb and Elcox had differences of opinions with Means on how to best defend Lori? Perhaps they didn't agree with the motions Means filed asking for the judge to withdraw? MOO.
A change of judge normally means LESS of a chance of getting any decision reconsidered—judges are very reluctant to second-guess what another judge has decided in the case.
That said, I’m sure she can ask for reduced bail anytime she says there’s been a change in the relevant circumstances.