Hi, I have read many of your comments with interest and this is my first post.
In the discussion about the photos of the room with the post/beam it was suggested that in the image with the dog/scatter cushions was a still photo taken from a video image due to the horizontal lines.
Some of the comments suggested that they could see an image of a small child (girl) contained within what was described as “hairs” or “smoke.”
It was pointed out that it couldn’t be a child because, relative to other items in the photo, the child was too small.
While it seems rather low-tech, I am wondering if the photo was literally taken from a screen/TV and the child is a reflection of a physical image - a photograph which was in close proximity to the screen at the time the photo of the screen was taken.
This would explain the faintness of the image and the size disparity. Just a thought.
