Agreed. That was my first impression when that info came out as well. I was just trying to fit it in with a potentially new context. But i think you’re right, I’m seeing signs that BM understood cameras but not digital evidence.
Sometimes I think we (WS members) mistakenly assume "most people" know the things we know about crime and evidence, investigative tools, DNA, etc. - or - that's it somehow common knowledge, giving suspects more credit than they deserve.
In random conversations I have with family, friends & co-workers, I find that "most people" really have a very
limited knowledge of these things. We (the collective us, here at WS) know about them because we follow true crime and we read probable cause affidavits, we read ME reports, we listen to pressers and watch the body language of persons of interest, and read the professional opinions of our many VIs on these forums. We're immersed in it, so it's definitely a known to us, but not so much the average person who isn't a true crime follower.
What convinces me this is true, that the "average Joe" doesn't know much about getting away with a terrible crime (thankfully), is that the suspects in SO many cases, ends up doing the same stupid thing, lying about the same stupid thing, having the same stupid motive, giving the same stupid excuses, sometimes even word for word, bashes LE in the same indignant, condescending way, always thinking they're the smartest person in the room.
I think we should all be glad that most terrible criminals are also NOT avid true crime followers.
jmo