Everything22
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
- Messages
- 219
- Reaction score
- 1,019
No, the way that bandage, or whatever, was on his hand, it looked like one finger opening was empty.
? Don't understand? Did he cut one off?
No, the way that bandage, or whatever, was on his hand, it looked like one finger opening was empty.
No, not that I am aware of...? Don't understand? Did he cut one off?
Has anyone seen where the Defense has filed any Discovery documents? Specifically, have they filed who their expert witnesses are and the subject of their testimony? Why does the Defense not have to file anything?
#67 She has turned over the transcripts I am pretty sure, but he still may try to argue and exclude it saying she was late turning it over. Do not think that will fly. I sure do hope we get some more tidbits about the older critical witness.2021 MOTION NO. 67 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE (DISCOVERY VIOLATION) FILED (VIA FAX) Attorney: PARKER, JOHN PATRICK
03/23/2021 MOTION NO. 68 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DEPOSE CRITICAL WITNESS PURSUANT TO CRIM. R. 15 FILED (VIA FAX) Attorney: PARKER, JOHN PATRICK
03/24/2021 COSTS FOR NOTICES MAILED
03/26/2021 MOTION NO. 67 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE (DISCOVERY VIOLATION) FILED (ORIGINAL) Attorney: PARKER, JOHN PATRICK
03/26/2021 MOTION NO. 68 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DEPOSE CRITICAL WITNESS PURSUANT TO CRIM. R. 15 FILED (ORIGINAL) Attorney: PARKER, JOHN PATRICK
So I wonder what we will here on this about GW4????
I have never noticed any type of bandage or bracelet type thing on him in court before. The first one is his last hearing the 2nd one is a previous court appearance.? Don't understand? Did he cut one off?
It looks like he has been trying to do something to the tattoo (maybe cutting on it with something) also the score on his face could mean he has staff infection because his face has had that score before, JMOIMO, does it really matter at this point if GW removed the tat? It is already well documented he has/had it. I think it would bring greater relevance if he has it removed. JMO
Agree, but different states use Grand Juries to varying extents.
IMO, arresting JM was some type of LE tactic to keep him off the map for a while, so they could focus on the W4. It appears it was a good one, as LE started the massive searches just weeks later. Those searches were not planned spur of the moment, they were the result of a long and thorough investigation.
JMO, MOO, etc.
ETA - A long and thorough investigation the W4 had thrown MANY red herrings into. By arresting JM, LE was able to eliminate one of those red herrings.
IMO, does it really matter at this point if GW removed the tat? It is already well documented he has/had it. I think it would bring greater relevance if he has it removed. JMO
But... then there's the red truck, with all its mysteries. And Judge Hogan signed off on it. I'm just not clear it was all bogus, totally my opinion.
The poster was more than likely FrescaandSouthernComfort IMO. Ring a bell for you?
"You can't see the forest for the trees" was my absolute favorite saying of FSC's. So true!!
Remember, JM didn't own the red truck at the time of the murders. He acquired it not too long before LE put the tracker on it. It did look like someone had set up JM.
Also another quote you provided. I will try to find it. Here it is:I believe that they thought they had information on that truck/JM when they got that warrant but then found out they were incorrect.
Remember, JM didn't own the red truck at the time of the murders. He acquired it not too long before LE put the tracker on it. It did look like someone had set up JM.
We know he did not own it in paper. Sometimes people have vehicles for long times but do not get tags or change the title. It does not seem like he had it in his possession/owned at time of murders though.
Theory. MO.
I think you are on to something here. Information on the truck.
It may be that they may have found out they were correct vs incorrect.
Correct - and so JM was released, no details.
We may have to face the FACTS that some details about the " undercurrent of drugs" and or the business that overlapped with the W's may be a factor. And that info will come out in the trial, although not a motive. No disrespect meant.
MO.
Do you have a personal theory as to how (or why) JM got the truck - who gave or lent it to him?
OI am not asking to name names, just do you have further thoughts on this point.
It is is so mysterious.
Does anyone have thoughts.