I really am in two minds as to whether he camped out and was returning home or he was there for another reason.
I think he could have been blood stained after the attack and there was no evidence in the photo,though only the top part of his body was shown. He did not immediately look as though he had spent the night in the woods.
with the bag,he might have been leaving the area to stay else where rather than returning to the scene.
He only lived just up the lane in the next village of Aylesham, so I can't see why he would have camped out.
Not only was he just 25 mins walk home, which murderer would want to spend the night sleeping out in the area where the crime was committed earlier in the day...?
Last edited: