(sbm)
I understand the valid contract and obligation thing. But I think “no autopsy” should have raised red flags for someone.
Cynic that I am, I wonder who sold the policy to Chad and Tammy, and who witnessed/sold the upgrade in benefits a little over one month before Tammy’s death. Yeah. How did all that transpire?
I mean, come on. Did the insurance agent really not question that timing after Tammy died about six weeks later?
I get it. Maybe the insurance company’s hands were tied, as no charges had been filed. But I don’t have to like it.
(I forget why an autopsy was not automatically done on Tammy, given the circumstances of her death. Was her death not suspicious to anyone?!?! Aren’t autopsies required by law when a death occurs at home, when sort of unattended, etc.?)