Are you saying someone cannot be guilty of something unless they are found guilty in a court of law? We cannot believe Barry is guilty because we have not yet heard every piece of case evidence discussed in a court of law? So, only someone who believes Barry to be innocent can be interested in the facts?
If I completely ignore the facts, I can believe Barry is innocent:
If I ignore what was going on in that marriage.
If I ignore the fact that Barry deleted texts that reflected poorly in the state of that marriage.
If I ignore Barry’s lies on the state of their marriage.
If I ignore the fact that Suzanne said she was afraid of him.
If I ignore the psychological abuse, and the threats of suicide.
If I ignore the fact that Suzanne dropped off the grid when Barry arrived home that afternoon.
If I ignore the cell phone data that shows Suzanne’s phone went dark before Barry claims to have left the house.
If I ignore the tranquilizer dart cap in the dryer, the package with one missing, and the materials he admitted to throwing away.
If I ignore the car and cell phone data that puts him outside an hour before he claims to have woken up, and in the vicinity of the bike.
If I ignore the 5 trash dumps, the costume changes, and the boots being thrown away.
If I ignore him forgetting what he threw away.
If I ignore the fact he left early for a job, worked 11 minutes, and then lied to the FBI about it.
If I ignore the lie about where he claimed he was when he received the call.
If I ignore the changing stories he gave to law enforcement over the entirety of the investigation.
If I ignore all of those things, and the things I didn’t even mention, then I could believe Barry is innocent.
I’d have to put my brain in a blender first though.