Anxala
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2020
- Messages
- 1,452
- Reaction score
- 6,504
Now we know.
It was a hard road she was on.
My heart goes out to her.
There go I ...etc...
How incredibly sad. And how heartbreaking for her family and friends.
Now we know.
It was a hard road she was on.
My heart goes out to her.
There go I ...etc...
Argh I don't understand why this is so confusing for everyone. All I am saying is *we don't know* whether she left or not, because there is no CCTV covering *her* usual exit. Ergo, had she left, we'd be none the wiser.LE have clearly stated today (and again) that NB did not leave the area. And that no other persons entered the area. I struggle with how that could not be any clearer? They have admitted that they'll keep other lines of inquiry open, but are still working on the basis NB did not leave the area, ergo is in the water.
They need corroboration for a vulnerable/high-risk status, but they will also seek to ensure the corroboration is solid/proven (ie medical/official/historical etc).The police were informed she had a number of specific vulnerabilities.. does that mean they take it as a given? I’m hoping that whilst they would take this information into account that they get that backed up medically or from a number of sources. I remain firmly of the belief this was not a tragic accident.
This is a physically fit mother who is able to take care of her appearance and hold down a job.
I have a family member who didn't know they had epilepsy until their first seizure in their 30s - could have had a first one. Also allowed to drive if seizure free for long enoughIf she had epilepsy, I'm not sure she'd be permitted to drive. However, it did cross my mind that perhaps she has some form of terminal cancer. This would certainly fit within 'vulnerabilities' as well as explain the Marie Curie post on her SM as well as the general lack of SM interaction over the last few months. A brain tumour could certainly trigger some kind of change of behaviour/seizure which could result in NB entering the river either intentionally or otherwise. It may also be why the particular 'vulnerability' has never been made public - I suspect that if a diagnosis was relatively recent, they probably haven't informed the children yet.
how so?It would appear that alcohol may have played a part in her disappearance in some way or another?
I had no idea...does it cause depression? This news is so sadSky News has just read out the statement from police. She was suffering with alcohol & menopause issues.
I completely sympathise with this. I am a similar age to her with severe menopause symptoms & it can be awful for some women.
This explains why the police are so adamant she fell in the river. <modsnip: not victim friendly>Sky News has just read out the statement from police. She was suffering with alcohol & menopause issues.
I completely sympathise with this. I am a similar age to her with severe menopause symptoms & it can be awful for some women.
This explains why the police are so adamant she fell in the river. <modsnip>
Yeah absolutely and she might have been drinking down there, had very little prior to the school run. Either way, poor Nicola and am so sorry for her family.We obviously know very little about Nicola's exact circumstances but I do knew from first hand experiences that alcoholics can hide their intake very well. <modsnip>
"....caused alcohol issue to RESURFACE." Oh dear, poor Nicola.
Oh my. That's not good. I wonder if there was a domestic dispute, what with the police being called as well. I wonder if the neighbours called the police? Or even PA himself? Oh dear.We now know NB had significant issues with alcohol, and that police and ambulance were called to her and PA's house on Jan 10. Together with PA's description of NB's behaviour on the morning of her disappearance being different to usual, it sadly doesn't appear her disappearance was foul play or an accident. A tragic situation all around.