BeginnerSleuther
Verified Physician
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2020
- Messages
- 2,669
- Reaction score
- 22,374
Anyone? Number 6? This seems to be specific, although it may or may not be related to why the defense is stating she may be a material witness, correct? Or not? Or something we're not allowed to ask? Sorry for asking this in the middle of discussion about the party at the fraternity, but it's bothering the heck out of me...
That is intriguing. Is it boilerplate for such summons? Is it another version of "we won't bust you for drugs or drinking" disclaimer that the Moscow police kept repeating? Or might they be referring to something specific?
JMO
I believe @PrairieWind replied to this a few pages ago and said the language sounds boilerplate, but that the person who received the subpoena is a public defender in NV, which is curious because maybe that suggests BF has a public defender in addition to her regular lawyer?
Here's PW's post.
4 Univ of Idaho Students Murdered, Bryan Kohberger Arrested, Moscow, 2022 #77
The most interesting thing about this is that the defense feels she has "exculpatory" information. I wonder what information she might have that the defense feels is exculpatory? Further, I wonder what information she might have that the defense feels would potentially even prevent a trial...
www.websleuths.com