Holdontoyourhat
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,299
- Reaction score
- 12
I'm asking if anybody sees anything unusual about these letters abcde clipped from the RN and shown below.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll bite. First of all the letters look unnatural. In fact, they look painstakingly made. Some of the letters lean in different directions making for a very awkward printing style, and I believe anyone printing in this fashion would be very slow going about it. One of the reasons we have cursive writing is for speed's sake. Printing takes more time, but this style of print would use up more time on the clock.
Okay so I moved them over to Windows Pic & Fax, enlarged them, and I can see an unusual amount of detail has gone into the making of each letter. What would normally be ovals or circles on the a b d and e are actually squares. Weird!!!
It screams fake ransom note to me, and PRDI, imo.
I'll bite. First of all the letters look unnatural. In fact, they look painstakingly made. Some of the letters lean in different directions making for a very awkward printing style, and I believe anyone printing in this fashion would be very slow going about it. One of the reasons we have cursive writing is for speed's sake. Printing takes more time, but this style of print would use up more time on the clock.
Okay so I moved them over to Windows Pic & Fax, enlarged them, and I can see an unusual amount of detail has gone into the making of each letter. What would normally be ovals or circles on the a b d and e are actually squares. Weird!!!
It screams fake ransom note to me, and PRDI, imo.
Actually I don't think it's a quantum leap. From looking at the note and letters it's blatantly obvious the person was trying to disguise their handwriting. A small foreign faction would have no reason to do that now would they?:crazy:
IIRC Patsy Ramsey could not be excluded. Was there ever anyone else found who couldn't be excluded?
But studing the RN why does it have alot of PR's traits..Now this is coming from her London,her right hand sample plus her left hand sample..
You know there have been plenty that said it was PR's writting and some said it was not, and out of all writting samples PR was the only one that couldn't be excluded..Now on this note yes, I really started studing the different writtings from PR and The RN just to find out why..To state that NO, I wouldn't want what happen to Tom Miller to happen to me...And tell the truth I was asking why not stating a fact...
Thru rose colored glasses...
There was a group of CDE's that were consulted on a professional level by the investigating authority. None of the group said it was PR's writing. End of story, and there's no tap-backs. The fact that this group came up empty was really a major blow to RDI, they don't know when to walk off the field.
If that wasn't enough, further study at the federal level, also initiated by the investigating authority, stated there was no evidence to suggest PR executed any of the material in ransom note.
I'm not sure where you get your information. Maybe you're picking and choosing what to read. The idea that 'it was PR's writing' is something you claim to exist when really it doesn't. Like prior abuse, handwriting match is a RDI myth .
Personally, I see no similarity between PR and RN author's writing. PR has loops, curves, and circles while the RN author is inconsistent, sloppy, with jagged rectangular lines where ovals or circles should be.
Thru rose colored glasses...
There was a group of CDE's that were consulted on a professional level by the investigating authority. None of the group said it was PR's writing. End of story, and there's no tap-backs. The fact that this group came up empty was really a major blow to RDI, they don't know when to walk off the field.
If that wasn't enough, further study at the federal level, also initiated by the investigating authority, stated there was no evidence to suggest PR executed any of the material in ransom note.
I'm not sure where you get your information. Maybe you're picking and choosing what to read. The idea that 'it was PR's writing' is something you claim to exist when really it doesn't. Like prior abuse, handwriting match is a RDI myth .
Uh, JMK was declared the author by a certified document examiner, with 99% certainty. We all know how that went. Right now, I think document examination is highly subjective and probably varies widely from expert to expert.
There is no document examiner that has mentioned the squared off rounded features. Maybe they never noticed or decided it wasn't important.
I don't know what kidnapper would leave the victim in the house if they had planned a kidnapping. If the victim struggled & was hit on the head too hard, why not go ahead and remove her & continue with the original plan? That would make sense. That didn't happen because neither kidnapping or money was what drove the assailant's actions. Common sense is all that's needed to deduce that.
I had some friends whose 12 yr. old daughter was raped by an intruder, at night, in the house she shared with her parents and brother. The intruder came in through the window in her bedroom, and held a knife to her throat. He didn't abduct her or kill her. nor alert the family's dog. Afterwards, the girl never felt safe there so her parents moved to a new neighborhood. It's obvious rape was the motive.
In the case of JBR, I'm not sure what the motive was, but it wasn't kidnapping for profit. In order to have it be an IDI, the motive has to fit with an IDI. If you can't find a motive that fits with an IDI, then you have to toss out the IDI.
These creeps who commit abductions for sexual purposes aren't dumb enough to leave the body behind nor commit the murder in the house. Sorry, MOO..
Killers don't spend time in houses with live people on hand.
This is less a ransom note than it is a bit of creative writing which reflects back on its author, and the author's experiences or lack of them. I don't care how many experts are dragged out, one always has to go back to the scene of the crime, look at those on hand along with their actions. Actions are all very telling.
I don't know what kidnapper would leave the victim in the house if they had planned a kidnapping. If the victim struggled & was hit on the head too hard, why not go ahead and remove her & continue with the original plan? That would make sense. That didn't happen because neither kidnapping or money was what drove the assailant's actions. Common sense is all that's needed to deduce that.
I had some friends whose 12 yr. old daughter was raped by an intruder, at night, in the house she shared with her parents and brother. The intruder came in through the window in her bedroom, and held a knife to her throat. He didn't abduct her or kill her. nor alert the family's dog. Afterwards, the girl never felt safe there so her parents moved to a new neighborhood. It's obvious rape was the motive.
In the case of JBR, I'm not sure what the motive was, but it wasn't kidnapping for profit. In order to have it be an IDI, the motive has to fit with an IDI. If you can't find a motive that fits with an IDI, then you have to toss out the IDI.
These creeps who commit abductions for sexual purposes aren't dumb enough to leave the body behind nor commit the murder in the house. Sorry, MOO..
Killers don't spend time in houses with live people on hand.
I agree the ransom note reflects on its authors. Better check the beheading, execution, killing won't be difficult parts of the RN. Then, have a look at JBR"s injuries. Note the violence in both word and deed. There's not now nor has there ever been any confusion on my part on the nature of the perp, and how unlike the R's or any other known suspect. The violence in the RN is consistent with the violence experienced by JBR, and indicates the violent personality behind it all, IMO.
Intruder motive, IMO (and with sincere ridicule from many RDI), is that JBR was to be kidnapped not for ransom, but for keeps. She was supposed to be kidnapped alive and become somebody's slave in another country.
BTW, how does a kidnapper kidnap, or a killer kill somebody in their house without live people on hand? Maybe read up on Charles Manson and the Tate & LaBianca murders. They spent time there and killed too.