Nova
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 19,648
- Reaction score
- 4,628
Amanda's drunken night 5 days prior to her witness interview is not evidence visa vie her lies, it is evidence in relation to the activities on the night of the murder. Being questioned as a witness, or doing a walkthrough of the cottage, is not evidence of anything....
My point was that you throw out four days of activities and then claim AK was only questioned for 2 hours. That others do not do the same doesn't make them wrong, must less liars; they simply take into consideration several days you have chosen to disregard.
It was my assumption that the pizza date was nice ... Amanda appeared to be in good spirits immediately after the dinner ... doing cartwheels and so on.
This sounds like strong evidence of innocence to me. A guilty 20-year-old, one with no previous experience with the police, should be expected to be quite nervous at a police station, no? Yet you and so many insist AK was acting carefree and lighthearted. Surely that was because at that point, she had nothing to hide and nothing to fear.
Two hours later she was "recovering" horrible memories of a murder. Wonder what happened in the interim...