Gma Kat
Wantonly distributing my opinion........
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,665
- Reaction score
- -5
World, what a GREAT analysis of Baez's decision-making track record. Thank you.
Re: Air samples. There is a long, long history of using air samples in the industrial setting. Air samples have long been tested in various types of mines, within steel mills and foundries, and numerous other industrial settings. The focus of this type of testing is for the safety of workers who are exposed to various gasses.
In addition, atmospheric air testing has been used to determine air safety quality for many, many years.
So, "air testing" per se could hardly be challenged. As far as testing for the chemicals present during a decomposition, I would think all such experiments would have been well documented by the scientists doing the tests.
With limited resources, I don't understand why Baez & Co. would even want to bother with this issue. If it was a stand alone issue, maybe. But what with Cindy, George, and the guy at the tow-yard, all of whom said they had prior experience with the smell of death, AND a cadaver dog hit - to me, it doesn't seem worth the time and cost to fight this.
Oh, and speaking of the dogs - seagull, yes, testimony from dog handlers is allowed. It was used in the Lacy Peterson case. I think, as with most all testimony, the jury is allowed to accept or reject the veracity and/or importance of it.
Thanks for putting that into perspective!