BBM ... I've never heard about this before ... could someone please explain the one home with the last name of Gonzales on the one side and Zeineida on the other?
(Also, I know that you all use ICA in place of the name Casey, but what does the "I" stand for?)
TIA!
ICA= Inmate Casey AnthonyBBM ... I've never heard about this before ... could someone please explain the one home with the last name of Gonzales on the one side and Zeineida on the other?
(Also, I know that you all use ICA in place of the name Casey, but what does the "I" stand for?)
TIA!
BBM ... I've never heard about this before ... could someone please explain the one home with the last name of Gonzales on the one side and Zeineida on the other?
(Also, I know that you all use ICA in place of the name Casey, but what does the "I" stand for?)
TIA!
With all due respect to WSers who sleuthed for three years because they care about little Caylee and justice, can someone help me see the point in this ongoing discussion of the evidence and what was allowed and what was not allowed, etc., given the perp has been found not guilty?
I mean, if Caylee's murder were an ongoing investigation I could understand, but the case has been solved and the killer is being set free so I just do not see the point in rehashing all this. I know some find it necessary for the healing process but I am not sure this is not more likely to prolong the pain of this sad, sad case.
What I want to know is, why, when she reached the end of the hallway (so to speak) with her mom, did she say Caylee had been missing for 31 days? If she had said missing since today, or even yesterday, it wouldn't have been so immediately suspect of her. Why did she give herself that month window to cast suspicion squarely on her story?
Did she use pure acetone or did she use nail polish remover? If she bought pure acetone, maybe someone remembers this purchase from a hardware store. Do Home Depot stores have those self-checkout stations?
I still don't get how Yuri Melich and ALL the other LE officers didn't check out Caseys car or smell this odor everyone else claims was so obvious and foul on that night in July. Cindy's 911 call clearly said "I found my daughters car today and it smells like theres been a dead body in the damn car" Didn't 911 pass on that allegation? How come LE didn't smell it in passing through the garage and by smelling it, recognize it as decomposition? It wouldn't have changed a whole lot because little Caylee was dead but I am curious why they didn't. Yuri Melich stated on the stand, that at the time they were looking for a live Caylee because of Caseys allegations of her being kidnapped and that any funky smell was peripheral. If the smell was so clearly decomposition to the point experts jumped back 2 steps, why LE didn't at least check it out.
Here are just a few of mine.
~ Where did Casey go when she said she was at work? If she was with friends, why didn't they ever question why she wasn't at work?
~ Didn't anyone question how she could afford a nanny? I know she kept telling everyone that she had a job but honestly, a nanny? Why didn't her parents ever question this, especially since she obviously appeared to have very little money and was also borrowing money (or stealing) from them?
~ How and where did ICA get the ingredients to make Chloroform?
~ Where was Caylee killed?
~ Did ICA take Caylee into the woods and dispose of her when it was light outside? If so, how did she manage to do that without anyone seeing her?
With all due respect to WSers who sleuthed for three years because they care about little Caylee and justice, can someone help me see the point in this ongoing discussion of the evidence and what was allowed and what was not allowed, etc., given the perp has been found not guilty?
I mean, if Caylee's murder were an ongoing investigation I could understand, but the case has been solved and the killer is being set free so I just do not see the point in rehashing all this. I know some find it necessary for the healing process but I am not sure this is not more likely to prolong the pain of this sad, sad case.
First off I stands for inmate.
Second if you rember her saying she dropped Caylee off with Zeineida Gonzales between 9 and 1.
The two houses at the end of her street. One was owned by the last name of Gonzales and one was owned by the first name Zeieida or vise a versa.
One had the number 9 and one had the number 1.
Third if you will follow the fence between them, it ends out to where Caylee was found.
So many weird things like this is what kept me comming back to read more.
*respectfully snipped*
Yes, this has bothered me immensely since day 1. Cindy handed it up to them on a silver platter with her 911 call and not one of them did a dang thing about it. AND initially left the car at the Anthony's to boot!
The home on the corner of Hopespring Dr and Suburban was owned, I believe, by a Hernandez Gonzales. The address is 4??1 Hopespring Drive and the backyard faces where Caylee's remains were found. In a home at 4??9 Hopespring Drive a woman lived (not owned) at one time whose first name was Zenaida. One of our posters looked up the names of people on the street and phone numbers to get this information. The statement KC made was she dropped Caylee off with ZFG between 9 and 1, notice the addresses on the properties. And where was Caylee found behind the homes where a Zenaida and a Hernandez Gonzales lived between 1 and 9 Hopespring, if you can see it that way. CA stated KC sometimes gives clues, you have to listen to her mistruths for the clues. Could the state have used this? Probably if it is true...but it would have just drug more innocent people into the mix to be degraded and accused of being a participant in this crime, IMO. FYI...Mr. Gonzales was not living in his home at the time because he had moved to PR. Can it get any crazier. jmo